PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12004810

Obstetric anaesthetists' workload.

M Y K Wee·S M Yentis·P Thomas
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The current recommendation of one consultant session per 500 deliveries with full sessional cover for units over 3000 deliveries is arbitrary and is not based on workload. The Audit Commission has questioned the wide variability of anaesthetic staffing on labour wards. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between current workload and obstetric anaesthetic staffing in five maternity units. In 1998, a 2-week diary of workload in the participating obstetric units was assessed in terms of staffing and clinical and nonclinical activities. The busiest time was 08:00 to 12:30. The working patterns between consultants and trainees varied considerably. Time spent on nonclinical activity by consultants averaged 51%. Any calculation of consultant sessions will need to take into account nonclinical activities. Other factors requiring consideration are the number of high-risk cases, as well as the number and experience of trainees.

Explore related subjects

AnesthesiologyHumansMedical AuditMedical Staff, HospitalObstetrics and Gynecology Department, HospitalStudents, MedicalWorkforceWorkloadJournal ArticleMulticenter Study

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Y K Wee, S M Yentis, P Thomas. 2002. Obstetric anaesthetists' workload.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0003-2409.2001.02402.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗