PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12010538

Cross-boundary working: implications for the multiprofessional team.

Abstract

This paper explores cross-boundary working and the impact it may have on the manner in which multiprofessional teams function. It draws on data collected for a study commissioned by the Department of Health, Human Resource Initiative entitled Evaluating New Roles in Practice (ENRiP). A series of case studies formed one part of the study that aimed to map the process of implementation of new roles in practice, identify the organizational barriers and levers that affected the implementation process and explore the meaning of the new roles from the perspective of postholders, patients and stakeholders. A naturalistic approach to enquiry was taken using a combination of participant observation, interviews and reflection. The article includes an overview of the current context in which cross-boundary work is developing, a review of current literature related to multiprofessional issues and team-working, a brief descriptions of the typology of new roles that emerged as one strand of the ENRiP study, and the impact that these roles had on both interprofessional and multiprofessional working. It concludes with a discussion of the implications for practice and the need to ensure that both education and policy are considered in planning for the future.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Julie Scholes, Barbara Vaughan. 2002. Cross-boundary working: implications for the multiprofessional team.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00634.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗