PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12016666

Validating a model: the expert systems research approach.

C Boswell
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The nursing profession is invariably resorting to the use of models to depict the key facets and relationships that are being uncovered through research. The expert systems approach to model validation incorporates into research methods a process authenticated by the disciplines of engineering and information systems. The seven-step process developed for a computer expert systems approach has been transformed into a Nine-Stage Schematic of the Process for Validating System Models. This article proposes the expert systems research approach to model validation as a means of clarifying and defining models within the discipline of nursing. This process was used to validate Boswell's Model of the Structure of Knowledge for Nursing, and the process conducted for this model will be discussed as a case study of the use of the expert systems approach for model validation.

Explore related subjects

Expert SystemsHumansModels, NursingResearch DesignJournal ArticleValidation Study

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Boswell. 2000. Validating a model: the expert systems research approach.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12016666/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

RENEX: an expert system for the interpretation of 99mTc-MAG3 scans to detect renal obstruction.

UNLABELLED: A renal expert system (RENEX) has been developed to assist physicians detect renal obstruction in patients undergoing pre- and postfurosemide 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (99mTc-MAG3) scans. RENEX uses quantitative parameters extracted from the dynamic renal scan data and heuristic rules in the form of a knowledge base (KB) obtained from expert interpreters to conclude whether a kidney is obstructed. METHODS: Normal limits were established for 47 quantitative parameters extracted from the 99mTc-MAG3 scans of 100 potential renal donors. From these data the domain expert estimated 5 boundary conditions for each parameter: (i) definitely abnormal, (ii) probably abnormal, (iii) equivocal, (iv) probably normal, and (v) definitely normal. A sigmoid-type curve was then generated from these 5 boundary conditions, creating a parameter knowledge library used for converting the value of a prospective patient's individual quantitative parameters to a certainty factor (CF). Sixty heuristic rules were extracted from the domain expert to generate the KB for detecting obstruction. A forward-chaining inference engine was developed using the MYCIN combinatories (an approximation of Bayes theorem) to determine obstruction. A justification engine was implemented, which recorded the sequence of each rule that was fired and the current CF value of all input and output parameters at the time of instantiation to track and justify the logic of the conclusions. The entire system was fine tuned and tested using a pilot group of 32 patients (11 males, 21 females; mean age, 56.8 +/- 17.2 y; 63 kidneys) deemed by an expert panel to have 41 unobstructed kidneys, 13 obstructed kidneys,and 9 equivocal findings. RESULTS: RENEX agreed with the expert panel in 92% (12/13) of the obstructed kidneys, 93% (38/41) of the unobstructed kidneys, and 78% (7/9) of the kidneys interpreted as equivocal for obstructions. Processing time per patient was practically instantaneous using a 3.0-GHz personal computer programmed using interactive data language. CONCLUSION: We have developed a renal expert system for detecting renal obstruction using pre- and postfurosemide 99mTc-MAG3 renal scans, at a standardized expert level. These encouraging preliminary results warrant a prospective study in a large population of patients with and without renal obstruction to establish the diagnostic performance of this system.

Expert Systems↗
PubMed2005

Expert knowledge without the expert: integrated analysis of gene expression and literature to derive active functional contexts.

MOTIVATION: The interpretation of expression data without appropriate expert knowledge is difficult and usually limited to exploratory data analysis, such as clustering and detecting differentially regulated genes. However, comparing experimental results against manually compiled knowledge resources might limit or bias the perspective on the data. Thus, manual analysis by experts is required to obtain confident predictions about involved processes. RESULTS: We present an algorithm to simultaneously derive interpretations of expression measurements together with biological hypotheses from biomedical publications. It identifies active functional contexts ('concepts'), i.e. gene clusters that exhibit both a significant gene expression as well as a coherent literature profile. Manual intervention by an expert in specifying prior knowledge is not required. The approach scales to realistic applications and does not rely on controlled vocabularies or pathway resources. We validated our algorithm by analyzing a current juvenile arthritis dataset. A number of gene clusters and accompanying literature topics are identified as an interpretation of the data that coincide well with the phenotype and biological processes known to be involved in the disease. We demonstrate that generated clusters are both more sensitive and more specific than Gene Ontology categories detected on the same data. The method allows for in-depth investigation of subsets of genes, the associated literature topics and publications. AVAILABILITY: Supplementary data on clusters is available upon request.

Expert Systems↗
PubMed2005

The development of the EASE model.

The estimation and assessment of substance exposure (EASE) model has been under development and in use since the early 1990s. It is a general model that can be used to predict workplace exposure to any substance hazardous to health. The current EASE model (version 2.0) has been used widely in the risk assessment of new and existing chemicals by the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and other regulatory agencies. EASE has also been distributed globally to over 200 users and therefore may have been used for many other purposes. Despite widespread use of the model, neither the development of its structure nor its underlying concepts and principles have been published in the open literature. Using surviving documentary evidence and discussions with key personnel, the creation and development of the model from 1992 to 2002 is described. The role of the HSE's National Exposure Database (NEDB) as the principal data source for the development of the model output exposure ranges is described. A number of problems and limitations of the model have been identified and the description of the model's development provides some explanation of their presence.

Expert Systems↗