PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12023818

Simplifying metabolic complexity.

Abstract

A complete description of the regulation of metabolism in even a single cell will be very hard to achieve, enormous and indigestible. However, there are two powerful ways to simplify the complexity. Firstly, related processes and intermediates can be grouped into a small number of modules, and the regulation of the simplified system can be studied. Secondly, control analysis can be used. With these simplifications to illuminate the important regulatory features, even a full description could be made intellectually and experimentally accessible without distorting the essential regulatory features. Modular control analysis is powerful because it can quantify the relative importance of different flows of regulatory information through any metabolic, physiological, signalling or transcriptional network. It can answer global questions about the importance of different pathways mediating any change to a system. It has been used to analyse how cadmium, a poison with multiple effects, changes oxidative phosphorylation in isolated mitochondria, and to quantify the regulation of energy metabolism in hepatocytes. It has been used to measure how energy metabolism is regulated during mitogen stimulation of thymocytes, quantifying the relative importance of different signalling pathways and how each pathway contributes to the activation of energy metabolism. Recently, we have applied modular control analysis to modern DNA microarray expression profiling to measure the importance of different groups of mRNA transcripts in mediating physiological responses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Martin D Brand, R Keira Curtis. 2002. Simplifying metabolic complexity.. https://doi.org/10.1042/0300-5127%3A0300025

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The human mitochondrial genome contains a second light strand promoter.

The human mitochondrial genome must be replicated and expressed in a timely manner to maintain energy metabolism and supply cells with adequate levels of adenosine triphosphate. Central to this process is the idea that replication primers and gene products both arise via transcription from a single light strand promoter (LSP) such that primer formation can influence gene expression, with no consensus as to how this is regulated. Here, we report the discovery of a second light strand promoter (LSP2) in humans, with features characteristic of a bona fide mitochondrial promoter. We propose that the position of LSP2 on the mitochondrial genome allows replication and gene expression to be orchestrated from two distinct sites, which expands our long-held understanding of mitochondrial gene expression in humans.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

GCN2 kinase activation by ATP-competitive kinase inhibitors.

Small-molecule kinase inhibitors represent a major group of cancer therapeutics, but tumor responses are often incomplete. To identify pathways that modulate kinase inhibitor response, we conducted a genome-wide knockout (KO) screen in glioblastoma cells treated with the pan-ErbB inhibitor neratinib. Loss of general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2) kinase rendered cells resistant to neratinib, whereas depletion of the GADD34 phosphatase increased neratinib sensitivity. Loss of GCN2 conferred neratinib resistance by preventing binding and activation of GCN2 by neratinib. Several other Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved inhibitors, such erlotinib and sunitinib, also bound and activated GCN2. Our results highlight the utility of genome-wide functional screens to uncover novel mechanisms of drug action and document the role of the integrated stress response (ISR) in modulating the response to inhibitors of oncogenic kinases.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Intracellular adenosine triphosphate and glutathione concentrations in oocytes from first estrous, multi-estrous, and testosterone-treated gilts.

Cytoplasmic maturation refers to a variety of cellular changes that must occur in the oocyte in order to progress through subsequent fertilization and embryonic development. Intracellular concentrations of ATP (ATPi) or glutathione (GSHi), indicative of metabolic activity or the ability of the oocyte to form a male pronucleus and cope with cellular stress, respectively, have been used as markers of cytoplasmic maturation in vitro. In the current study, our objective was to determine if concentrations of ATPi and GSHi in oocytes recovered from three groups of gilts were associated with known differences in developmental competence within these populations. In vivo matured oocytes were surgically recovered 36-38 h after the onset of estrus from first estrous gilts, multi-estrous gilts, and multi-estrous gilts receiving testosterone (1mg/2 ml per day; day 13 to estrus, day 0=day of estrus). Concentrations of ATPi and GSHi were determined using a bioluminescent somatic cell assay kit (luciferin-luciferase reaction) and the dithiobisnitrobenzoic acid (DTNB)-glutathione reductase recycling reaction, respectively. There were no differences (P>0.05) between ATPi concentrations in oocytes from the three groups (1.52 +/- 0.10, 1.51 +/- 0.11, 1.56 +/- 0.11pmol per oocyte). In contrast, oocytes from multi-estrous gilts had higher (P<0.05) concentrations of GSHi (31.53 +/- 1.66 to 33.67 +/- 2.30 pmol per oocyte) than oocytes from first estrous gilts (25.07 +/- 0.82). Administration of testosterone did not affect (P>0.05) GSHi concentrations in oocytes from multi-estrous gilts. Differences in developmental potential between the three groups of gilts were apparently not due to different concentrations of ATPi. However, GSHi concentrations were higher in oocytes from multi-estrous gilts, suggesting that reduced developmental potential of oocytes from first-estrus gilts may be related to insufficient amounts of GSHi. The beneficial effect of exogenous testosterone on the percentage of embryos surviving early gestation does not appear to be due to increased GSHi. Of the numerous potential markers of developmental potential, two were examined in the current study, and GSHi appeared to be useful for assessing porcine oocytes.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗