PubMed · 12026722
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
William L Wildey, E Steve Senia. 2002. Simple, precise, and predictable root canal obturation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12026722/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: We sought to measure the residual dentin thickness (RDT) in the mesial roots of mandibular molars after instrumentation with Lightspeed and Gates-Glidden rotary instruments. Study design Thirty extracted, untreated human mesial roots of mandibular molars were separated from the distal roots and embedded in clear polyester resin. The roots were cut horizontally at 1, 4, and 7 mm short of the anatomic apex. The diameter of each mesiobuccal canal was measured by using a stereo measuring microscope at each level in the buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. The dentin thickness was measured in each level in the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual directions. Sections were reassembled with a muffle. The canals were enlarged to the working length with Lightspeed rotary instruments, of which the average size used was a No. 50 file. The coronal third was flared with No. 2 Gates-Glidden reamers. Slices were separated again, and the RDT and canal diameters were measured. RESULTS: The minimal measured RDT after instrumentation at the 1-, 4-, and 7-mm levels was 0.70 +/- 0.28 mm, 1.04 +/- 0.18 mm, and 1.09 +/- 0.19 mm, respectively. The average diameter of the canals after instrumentation at the 1-, 4-, and 7-mm levels was 0.50 +/- 0.04 mm, 0.52 +/- 0.05 mm, and 0.74 +/- 0.08 mm, respectively. The canal diameter did not exceed one third of the root diameter at all levels. CONCLUSIONS: Root canal preparation of mandibular mesial roots with Lightspeed instruments to No. 50 in the apical third and Gates-Glidden reamers to No. 2 in the coronal third does not significantly decrease the RDT.
AIM: To compare procedural errors occurring during preparation of root canals by junior dental students in patients using a new '8-step method' versus traditional 'serial step-back technique. METHODOLOGY: Junior dental students treated 291 root canals of maxillary and mandibular teeth in patients. A new '8-step method' was used to prepare 149 canals, whilst the traditional 'serial step-back technique' was used for 142 root canals. Instrumentation was carried out in both techniques using standardized stainless steel K-files and coronal flaring with Gates-Glidden reamers. In the apical one-third, a filing motion was used in the traditional technique: with the '8-step method,' reaming or filing motions were used in sizes up to 25 and only reaming in sizes larger than 25. All root canals were obturated with gutta-percha points and AH26 using a lateral condensation technique. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were made of each tooth. Procedural errors were recorded and statistically analysed using a binomic test for comparison of proportion. RESULTS: Significantly (P < (1.0001) more root canals maintained their original shape with no deviation (91%) with the'8-step method' compared to the traditional 'serial step-back technique' (61%). The procedural errors detected with the'8-step method' consisted of 10 canals with transportation (5%) and five with root perforations (2%); there were no canal obstructions. With the 'serial step-back technique: significantly (P < 0.0001) more errors occurred: 28 canals were transported (17%), 10 had root perforations (7%), and 16 canals were obstructed (6%). The differences in maintaining the original root canal shape between the two methods were significantly greater in molar versus anterior teeth. CONCLUSIONS: The new '8-step method' resulted in fewer procedural errors than the traditional 'serial step-back technique' when junior students prepared root canals in patients.
AIM: To investigate in vitro the incidence and position of the root canal isthmus in extracted mesiobuccal roots of maxillary and mesial roots of mandibular first molars. METHODOLOGY: Fifty maxillary and 50 mandibular molars were included in the study. The mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars and the mesial roots of mandibular molars were sectioned from their crowns in the furcation region and embedded in clear resin. Transverse serial 1-mm-thick sections from the apical 6 mm were prepared. The apical side of each section was stained with India ink and observed through a light microscope. The sample images were saved to disk using a digital camera and the root canals in terms of the number present and the incidence and classification of isthmuses. RESULTS: In the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molars, 70% had one canal, whereas 29.5% had two canals. In the mesial root of mandibular molars, 41% had one canal, whereas 59% had two canals. In some sections, more than two canals were found close to the apical foramen. The isthmus incidence was greatest 3-5 mm from the apex. In teeth having two canals, a complete or partial isthmus was frequently observed in the sections between 3 and 4 mm from the apex. Of the isthmuses present, 22% were complete and 37% partial in mandibular molars and 17.3% were complete and 11.7% partial in maxillary molars. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of isthmus in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molars and in the mesial root of the mandibular first molars was high, particularly in sections 3-5 mm from the apex. Cleaning the isthmus is a major challenge during root canal treatment.