PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12030666

Current issues in fitness for work certification.

Abstract

This paper explores some current issues for certifying medical practitioners in the United Kingdom (UK), particularly general practitioners (GPs), who provide medical advice to their patients on fitness for work. Medical statements that doctors use to record this advice, such as form Med 3 and form Med 4, may be used by patients as evidence to support claims for financial benefits, including Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) and state incapacity benefits. The UK employment context for sick or disabled people of working age is beginning to change, but many barriers to work retention and work resumption still exist. The UK government has embarked on a wide range of reforms that are aimed at improving work opportunities for disabled people. Research evidence on certification practice, coupled with a better understanding of the factors that can create and perpetuate sickness absence from work, suggest possible areas for reviewing clinical practice. An agenda for improving the quality of advice provided to patients of working age in the primary health care setting will need to encompass visible professional leadership, more research into current practice, and an adequately resourced programme of education for all key stakeholders.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Philip Sawney. 2002. Current issues in fitness for work certification.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12030666/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Implementing emergency research requiring exception from informed consent, community consultation, and public disclosure.

Conducting emergency research in the out-of-hospital and emergency department setting is a challenge because of the inability of patients to provide informed consent in many situations. Federal guidelines allowing research under an exception from informed consent for emergency research have been established (21 CRF 50.24). Community consultation and public disclosure, 2 required components of obtaining this exception, are seen by many as a barrier to resuscitation research. This article will provide a brief overview of the history of the exception from informed consent for emergency research and summarize our methods recently used to successfully complete community consultation and public disclosure for a trial evaluating 2 devices used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large metropolitan area.

Attitude to Health↗