PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12030754

Students' evaluation of problem-based learning.

Abstract

This paper examines students' evaluations of the use of problem-based learning over a 4-week period in a 'traditional' discipline-structured nursing degree. A total of 130 Year 2 students experienced the period of problem-based learning and 100 responses to an evaluative questionnaire were received and analyzed. The paper outlines the ways in which students found their learning different -- how they perceived themselves differently as students and the relationship of the learning process to their clinical practice. The analysis of the responses found that the problem-based learning approach promoted critical thinking and problem solving; active participation in the learning process including self-direction, identification of own learning needs, teamwork, creative discussion and learning from peers; and the integration and synthesis of a variety of knowledge. The paper also concludes that this type of learning was realistic, fun and interesting for students. These findings are important for nurse educators, particularly those involved in curriculum or subject design and implementation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marie Cooke, Kadie Moyle. 2002. Students' evaluation of problem-based learning.. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0713

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Providing cancer services to remote and rural areas: consensus study.

There is controversy about how cancer care should be provided to patients in remote and rural areas. The aim of this project was to measure consensus among health professionals who treat rural patients with cancer about priorities for cancer care. A modified Delphi process was used. Of 78 health professionals in Grampian, 62 responded (79%). Of 49 items suggested, there was agreement on 26 (53%), encompassing fast access to diagnosis, high-quality specialist treatment, and well-coordinated delivery of care with good and fast communication and effective team working between all health professionals involved. Specialist oncology nurses in local hospitals were considered a priority along with good facilities, accommodation, and transport for patients. There was no agreement on the best location for chemotherapy (local or central). The only large difference of opinion between participants based in primary and secondary care concerned chemotherapy provision at local community hospitals (primary care was in favour, hospital practitioners against, P&<0.001). In making their decisions, participants took problems of access into account, but were also concerned with quality of care and feasibility in the current health service. Our findings show that more evidence is needed regarding the balance of risks and benefits of local chemotherapy provision. Overall, however, there is agreement on many principles for cancer care that could be translated into practice.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗