PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12036162

Laboratory evaluation of amalgam separators.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amalgam in dental wastewater is receiving increasing scrutiny from regulators because of national, state and local initiatives to reduce or virtually eliminate the discharge of mercury and mercury-containing items into the environment. Amalgam separators are considered to be one means of reducing the amount of amalgam that dental offices discharge into sewers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amalgam removal efficiency of commercially available amalgam separators and the total mercury concentration in the effluent from laboratory testing. METHODS: The authors evaluated the amalgam removal efficiency of 12 amalgam separators according to International Organization for Standardization, or ISO, Standard 11143 for Amalgam Separators. Total mercury concentration in the effluent was calculated using the mass of amalgam particles larger than 1.2 micrometers and the volume of effluent, together with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, Method 245.1 for amalgam particles smaller than 1.2 microm. Total dissolved mercury also was determined. RESULTS: The results show that all 12 amalgam separators exceeded the ISO 11143 requirement of 95 percent amalgam removal efficiency. Statistical differences were found in the efficiencies of the separators. Both the total mercury concentration and total dissolved mercury concentration in the effluent demonstrated large variations. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This laboratory evaluation shows that amalgam separators removed at least 96.09 percent of the amalgam in samples with particle-size distribution as specified in ISO 11143. Total mercury concentration and total dissolved mercury concentration in the effluent varied widely for each amalgam separator. Additional research is needed to develop test methods to evaluate the efficiency of amalgam separators in removing small amalgam particles, colloidal amalgam particles and ionic mercury in solution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P L Fan, Hanu Batchu, Hwai-Nan Chou, William Gasparac, Jim Sandrik, Daniel M Meyer. 2002. Laboratory evaluation of amalgam separators.. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0233

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Failure mode of dental restorative materials under Hertzian indentation.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application of Hertzian indentation testing to amalgam and GIC; study the failure behavior of the bi-layer structure of each material on a relatively soft substrate; and investigate the effect of thickness. METHODS: Amalgam (Lojic+, SDI, Bayswater, Australia) and ceramic-reinforced GIC (Advanced Healthcare, Tonbridge, UK) discs, 10 mm diameter, thicknesses ranging from 0.4 to 8.0 mm, were tested resting freely on a substrate (30% glass fibre-reinforced polyamide; E=10GPa, 10 mm diameter and 5 mm thick). Increasing load was applied to the center of the disc by a 20 mm-diameter hard steel ball until fracture occurred. Acoustic emission sensing was used as a supplemental method for crack detection. The load at the first crack was recorded. Fracture surfaces were observed under SEM to identify the crack initiation site and the failure mode. RESULTS: The main failure mode of both materials shifted from bottom-initiated radial cracking to near-contact cone cracking or subsurface plastic deformation as the thickness was increased. There was a wide thickness range for the transition of the failure mode for amalgam. Failure load was proportional to the square of thickness for amalgam, except for deviations at small and very large thickness; for the GIC, it was proportional to the thickness to the power approximately 1.6, except for thin layers. SIGNIFICANCE: The Hertzian indentation test can be applied to investigate the failure behavior of amalgam and GIC in addition to ceramics, for which purpose it may have value as a routine test. Failure mode changed with specimen thickness. The importance of considering both failure mode and failure load or strength is emphasized.

Dental Amalgam↗