PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12037754

Pediatric appendicitis score.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Morbidity in children treated with appendicitis results either from late diagnosis or negative appendectomy. A Prospective analysis of efficacy of Pediatric Appendicitis Score for early diagnosis of appendicitis in children was conducted. METHODS: In the last 5 years, 1,170 children aged 4 to 15 years with abdominal pain suggestive of acute appendicitis were evaluated prospectively. Group 1 (734) were patients with appendicitis and group 2 (436) nonappendicitis. Multiple linear logistic regression analysis of all clinical and investigative parameters was performed for a model comprising 8 variables to form a diagnostic score. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis yielded a model comprising 8 variables, all statistically significant, P <.001. These variables in order of their diagnostic index were (1) cough/percussion/hopping tenderness in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen (0.96), (2) anorexia (0.88), (3) pyrexia (0.87), (4) nausea/emesis (0.86), (5) tenderness over the right iliac fossa (0.84), (6) leukocytosis (0.81), (7) polymorphonuclear neutrophilia (0.80) and (8) migration of pain (0.80). Each of these variables was assigned a score of 1, except for physical signs (1 and 5), which were scored 2 to obtain a total of 10. The Pediatric Appendicitis Score had a sensitivity of 1, specificity of 0.92, positive predictive value of 0.96, and negative predictive value of 0.99. CONCLUSION: Pediatric appendicitis score is a simple, relatively accurate diagnostic tool for accessing an acute abdomen and diagnosing appendicitis in children.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Madan Samuel. 2002. Pediatric appendicitis score.. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.32893

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Persistent post-laparoscopy pneumoperitoneum.

BACKGROUND: Persistent pneumoperitoneum after a laparoscopic operation can represent either residual postoperative pneumoperitoneum or free intraperitoneal gas released from the gastrointestinal tract. This animal study was conducted to better characterize the extent and duration of postoperative pneumoperitoneum as detected by computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Five pigs underwent cholecystectomy, four laparoscopically and one open. All pigs were followed serially with upright chest radiographs and abdominal CT scans beginning immediately postoperatively and continuing daily until resolution of pneumoperitoneum as detected by both imaging modalities. All radiographs and CT scans were reviewed by dedicated radiologists who reported the extent and duration of pneumoperitoneum in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: Pneumoperitoneum resolved on upright chest radiographs in all five pigs by or on postoperative day 1. Serial CT scans demonstrated that the laparoscopic group had either resolution of pneumoperitoneum or minimal persistence of free intraperitoneal gas by postoperative day 2. In contrast, the single pig in the open group had CT evidence of persistent pneumoperitoneum through postoperative day 6. CONCLUSIONS: In the pig model, small pockets of free intraperitoneal gas detected by CT scanning are expected to resolve by postoperative day 2 following laparoscopic surgery. Persistence of pneumoperitoneum beyond this interval is abnormal and may represent a perforated viscus. Whereas a prospective CT imaging study in humans is not ethically feasible, we believe that parallel conclusions between the pig and human may be drawn.

Abdominal Pain↗

Comparison of long-term quality of life after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Although many studies have compared open and laparoscopic procedures, showing many advantages in favor of the laparoscopic technique during the early postoperative period, only a limited number of reports in the literature compare the two techniques during the later follow-up period with regard to quality of life. This study aimed to compare the effects of these two cholecystectomy techniques on the quality of life and clinical outcome of the patients during long-term follow-up evaluation. METHODS: This study evaluated 200 patients who underwent cholecystectomy operations with either technique between 1993 and 1999 in our department. There were 100 patients in each group. Both groups were similar with respect to age, gender, body mass indexes, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores, and indications for surgery. The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 Health survey (SF-36), which includes 36 items, was used for evaluating the quality-of-life index. In addition to this, a system-specific instrument for gastrointestinal diseases was used to investigate clinical outcome. RESULTS: The mean administration time for the questionnaire was 46.8 +/- 18.7 months in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) group and 41.5 +/- 16 months in the open cholecystectomy (OC) group. Statistically significant differences were noted in the scores for all eight SF = 36 health status domains in favor of laparospopic surgery. No statistically significant difference was found for abdominal pain, location of the pain, referral to a doctor for the pain, accompanying symptoms, relieving factors for the pain, distention, and dyspeptic complaints, usage of antacid therapy, weight changes, changes in bowel habit, need for a special diet, or sexual functions between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The gastrointestinal clinical symptoms were similar in the two groups during the long-term follow-up evaluation, but laparoscopic cholecystectomy was found to be significantly superior to the open technique with respect to the quality of life over the long term.

Abdominal Pain↗