PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12037839

[Clinical research methods in the nursing discipline framework].

Abstract

Within the nursing discipline, the research helps or should help to develop and assess the theories related to the relevant phenomena. A professional discipline such as ours determines the relevant phenomena through its sphere of activity and the priorities of the society in general. With time, the disciplines develop a preference in the way of thinking about their discipline. At that point, there is no singular approach to the development of knowledge inside the nursing discipline, and no consensus either on the way of carrying out nursing research, whether it is applied or not. From time immemorial, the logical and systematic chain of reasoning coupled with the minute observation, the reflection and the intuition have built up the processes essential to the understanding of the human natural phenomena. Thus, the nursing research was mainly influenced by the two prevailing approaches (quantitative and qualitative) both focused on the experience, but using different strategies to get in touch with reality. Recently, the triangulation of the research elements seems more frequent, whether it is the combination of theories, of methods or of researchers of different disciplines with different perspectives. Each approach has its own methods and criteria to collect and analyse the data, then to interpret and check the results. The reproduction and the confirmation of this knowledge through additional and critical research are essential if we want this knowledge to be recognized by this discipline.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Goulet. 1999. [Clinical research methods in the nursing discipline framework].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12037839/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Factors influencing the development of evidence-based practice: a research tool.

AIM: The paper reports a study to develop and test a tool for assessing a range of factors influencing the development of evidence-based practice among clinical nurses. BACKGROUND: Achieving evidence-based practice is a goal in nursing frequently cited by the profession and in government health policy directives. Assessing factors influencing the achievement of this goal, however, is complex. Consideration needs to be given to a range of factors, including different types of evidence used to inform practice, barriers to achieving evidence-based practice, and the skills required by nurses to implement evidence-based care. METHODS: Measurement scales currently available to investigate the use of evidence in nursing practice focus on nurses' sources of knowledge and on barriers to the use of research evidence. A new, wider ranging Developing Evidence-Based Practice questionnaire was developed and tested for its measurement properties in two studies. In study 1, a sample of 598 nurses working at two hospitals in one strategic health authority in northern England was surveyed. In study 2, a slightly expanded version of the questionnaire was employed in a survey of 689 community nurses in 12 primary care organizations in two strategic health authorities, one in northern England and the other in southern England. FINDINGS: The measurement characteristics of the new questionnaire were shown to be acceptable. Ten significant, and readily interpretable, factors were seen to underlie nurses' relation to evidence-based practice. CONCLUSION: Strategies to promote evidence-based practice need to take account of the differing needs of nurses and focus on a range of sources of evidence. The Developing Evidence-Based Practice questionnaire can assist in assessing the specific 'evidencing' tendencies of any given group of nurses.

Clinical Nursing Research↗

Subglottic secretion viscosity and evacuation efficiency.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common nosocomial pneumonia that occurs in critically ill patients and results in mortality rates as high as 71%. Subglottic secretions (SSs) are a known risk factor. Several clinical trials have shown that continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions (CASS) reduces the risk of VAP by nearly half. Optimal suction pressure levels needed to efficiently evacuate viscous SSs are unknown. The purpose of this study was to describe SSs and the effective suction pressure (20 mmHg, 30 mmHg, 40 mmHg, and 50 mmHg) needed to maximize evacuation efficiency based on SS volume (2 ml, 4 ml, and 6 ml) and viscosity (watery, thick, and gel-like). A laboratory model was designed to replicate a human trachea. Thick secretions had the highest percentage of mean recovery representative of evacuation efficiency of SSs (mean recovery of 86%). The suction pressure of 30 mmHg had the highest overall mean of secretion recovery (83%) across all viscosity types and amounts. This study demonstrated that higher viscosity secretions were easier to evacuate than lower viscosity secretions when 30-mmHg suction pressure was applied. Management of secretion viscosity may assist in secretion removal and delay VAP development. With increased understanding of the molecular structure of SSs, there is the potential that clinicians will be able to manipulate secretion viscoelastic properties to maximize evacuation efficiency of the secretions. Further research is needed to identify safe suction pressures for optimal evacuation of SSs in human subjects.

Clinical Nursing Research↗