PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12055631

Facilitation at single synapses probed with optical quantal analysis.

Abstract

Many synapses can change their strength rapidly in a use-dependent manner, but the mechanisms of such short-term plasticity remain unknown. To understand these mechanisms, measurements of neurotransmitter release at single synapses are required. We probed transmitter release by imaging transient increases in [Ca(2+)] mediated by synaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) in individual dendritic spines of CA1 pyramidal neurons in rat brain slices, enabling quantal analysis at single synapses. We found that changes in release probability, produced by paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) or by manipulation of presynaptic adenosine receptors, were associated with changes in glutamate concentration in the synaptic cleft, indicating that single synapses can release a variable amount of glutamate per action potential. The relationship between release probability and response size is consistent with a binomial model of vesicle release with several (>5) independent release sites per active zone, suggesting that multivesicular release contributes to facilitation at these synapses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thomas G Oertner, Bernardo L Sabatini, Esther A Nimchinsky, Karel Svoboda. 2002. Facilitation at single synapses probed with optical quantal analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn867

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Modulation of ischaemic contracture in mouse hearts: a 'supraphysiological' response to adenosine.

While inhibition of ischaemic contracture was one of the first documented cardioprotective actions of exogenously applied adenosine, it is not known whether this is a normal function of endogenous adenosine generated during ischaemic stress. Additionally, the relevance of delayed contracture to postischaemic outcome is unclear. We tested the ability of endogenous versus exogenous adenosine to modify contracture (and postischaemic outcomes) in C57/Bl6 mouse hearts. During ischaemia, untreated hearts developed peak contracture (PC) of 85 +/- 5 mmHg at 8.9 +/- 0.8 min, with time to reach 20 mmHg (time to onset of contracture; TOC) of 4.4 +/- 0.3 min. Adenosine (50 microm) delayed TOC to 6.7 +/- 0.6 min, as did pretreatment with 10 microm 2-chloroadenosine (7.2 +/- 0.5 min) or 50 nm of A(1) adenosine receptor (AR) agonist N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) (6.7 +/- 0.3 min), but not A(2A)AR or A(3)AR agonists (20 nm 2-[4-(2-carboxyethyl) phenethylamino]-5' N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS21680) or 150 nm 2-chloro-N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide (Cl-IB-MECA), respectively). Adenosinergic contracture inhibition was eliminated by A(1)AR gene knockout (KO), mimicked by A(1)AR overexpression, and was associated with preservation of myocardial [ATP]. This adenosine-mediated inhibition of contracture was, however, only evident after prolonged (10 or 15 min) and not brief (3 min) pretreatment. Ischaemic contracture was also insensitive to endogenously generated adenosine, since A(1)AR KO, and non-selective and A(1)AR-selective antagonists (50 microm 8-sulphophenyltheophylline and 150 nm 8-cyclopentyl-1, 3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), respectively), all failed to alter intrinsic contracture development. Finally, delayed contracture with A(1)AR agonism/overexpression or ischaemic 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM; 5 microm to target Ca(2+) cross-bridge formation) was linked to enhanced postischaemic outcomes. In summary, adenosinergic inhibition of contracture is solely A(1)AR mediated; the response is 'supraphysiological', evident only with significant periods of pre-ischaemic AR agonism (or increased A(1)AR density); and ischaemic contracture appears insensitive to locally generated adenosine, potentially owing to the rapidity of contracture development versus the finite time necessary for expression of AR-mediated cardioprotection.

2-Chloroadenosine↗

Long-term stimulation of adenosine A2b receptors begun after myocardial infarction prevents cardiac remodeling in rats.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine inhibits proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts and hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes, both of which may play crucial roles in cardiac remodeling. In the present study, we investigated whether chronic stimulation of adenosine receptors begun after myocardial infarction (MI) prevents cardiac remodeling. METHODS AND RESULTS: MI was produced in Wistar rats by permanent ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. One week after the onset of MI, animals were randomized into 8 groups: vehicle, dipyridamole (DIP; the adenosine uptake inhibitor, 50 mg/kg), 2-chroloadenosine (CADO; the stable analogue of adenosine, 2 mg/kg), and CADO in the presence of the nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist 8-sulfophenyltheophylline (8-SPT) or the selective antagonist for adenosine A1, A2a, A2b, or A3 receptor. Three weeks after treatment, hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters in the DIP and CADO groups were significantly improved compared with the vehicle group. These hemodynamic and echocardiographic improvements were blunted by either 8-SPT or the selective adenosine A2b antagonist MRS1754 but not by the selective antagonists for other subtypes of adenosine receptors. The collagen volume fraction was smaller, and gene expression of the molecules associated with cardiac remodeling such as matrix metalloproteinase in noninfarcted areas was reduced in the DIP and CADO groups compared with the vehicle group, both of which were attenuated by either 8-SPT or MRS1754. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term stimulation of adenosine A2b receptors begun after MI attenuates cardiac fibrosis in the noninfarcted myocardium and improves cardiac function. Drugs that stimulate adenosine A2b receptors or increase adenosine levels are new candidates for preventing cardiac remodeling after MI.

2-Chloroadenosine↗

Mechanism of 2-chloroadenosine toxicity to PC3 cell line.

BACKGROUND: 2-CADO inhibits the growth of several types of cells and causes apoptosis by a mechanism which involves adenosine receptors or cellular uptake or both. METHODS: Androgen-independent (PC3) prostate cancer cells were used in the study and proliferation, cell-cycle progression, and apoptosis analyzed. Deoxy-and ribonucleoside triphosphate pools were determined by HPLC. The molecular mechanism was examined by assessing the involvement of DNA synthesizing enzymes in the cellular response. RESULTS: 2-CADO treatment dramatically reduced the number of prostate cancer cells and permanently stopped cell-cycle progression in the S-phase. The role of 2-CADO in prostate cancer cells is uptake-mediated and followed by sequential phosphorylations to 2-Cl-ATP that irreversibly inhibits several key-enzymes for DNA biosynthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Arrest of DNA synthesis responsible for toxicity of 2-CADO to PC3 cells is due to the lack of substrates for DNA polymerization caused by irreversible inhibition of purine/pyrimidine ribo-and 2-deoxyribonucleotides salvage enzymes.

2-Chloroadenosine↗