PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12099777

Cough provocation tests: their clinical value.

Abstract

Cough provocation testing was originally developed for testing new anti-tussive agents and still remains a mandatory tool in their development. The methodology has been developed into single breath and multiple breath techniques. Neither has been fully validated; however, single breath techniques have been used in a number of patient series of more than 100 patients. These studies show that the cough reflex is more sensitive in patients with cough and becomes normal on recovery. Studies in the common cold and in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor-associated cough suggest that this may be cause and effect. These results point to a utility for cough provocation testing in epidemiology but not in routine clinical practice. The one exception in clinical practice is in the assessment of patient post stroke where it is a better method, than voluntary cough testing, for assessing damage to the cough reflex. Other than use in epidemiology it remains an invaluable tool in hypothesis testing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R W Fuller. 2002. Cough provocation tests: their clinical value.. https://doi.org/10.1006/pupt.2002.0355

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Palliation for respiratory syndrome].

Respiratory symptoms such as dyspnea, coughing, bronchorrhea, hemoptysis and death rattle are a common problem in palliative medicine. Their prevalence increases markedly in terminal phase oncological patients. In such cases, new therapeutic methods with lower toxicity and well documented efficiency in the control of respiratory syndrome should be considered.

Cough↗

Reconstruction of the inventory of materia medica used by members of the Jewish community of medieval Cairo according to prescriptions found in the Taylor-Schechter Genizah collection, Cambridge.

The Taylor-Schechter (T-S) collection at Cambridge University Library is the biggest of all Cairo Genizah collections in the world. The importance and the potential of research into the medical aspects of the Genizah documents were clear to researcher since the early 1960s. A few works have been published since, usually focusing on one subject, or even important single manuscripts. The current research concerned mainly with one aspect of the history of medicine of the Jewish community of Cairo (as a reflection of Eastern medieval societies), namely the practical uses of natural substances for medicine. The most interesting and original information is undoubtedly to be found in the 141 prescriptions, as they reflect the medical reality that actually existed. And indeed, 242 substances were recorded in the prescriptions identified: 195 substances of plants origin (80.6%), 27 inorganic materials (11.2%) and 20 substances of animal origin (8.2%) were recorded as being in practical used for medicinal purposes. The most frequently mentioned substances were the rose, myrobalan, sugar, almonds, and endive. The most prevalent ailments: eye diseases, headache, constipations (purgative), cough, skin diseases, stomach, fever, gynaecological problems, haemorrhoids, liver ailments, lice, swellings, dental trouble, ulcers, and problems of the urinary tract.

Cough↗