PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12128021

Texture segmentation performance related to cortical geometry.

Abstract

There are two prevailing explanations for the foveal deficit in texture segmentation reported in previous works. One is based on the spatial and temporal properties of the stimuli, which means in terms of physiology a strong contribution of the Magno-channel. The other one is purely spatial and assigns filters of different bandwidths to each eccentricity in the visual field. We have challenged the first explanation experimentally by using isoluminant stimuli. The central performance drop persisted although the Magno-channel is known to respond weakly to stimuli with low luminance contrast. Therefore, we agreed with the spatial explanation. But instead of the abstract filter theories from previous works we propose a computational neural model assuming local lateral interactions in a cortical map model. The psychophysical performance measures could be directly related to geometric properties of the primary visual cortex concerning its mapping geometry and its intrinsic interaction width. Our model accounts quantitatively for our own psychophysical data as well as for others from literature. In general, we claim that the high foveal retino-cortical magnification maps texture elements too far away from each other for being compared by local processes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jens von Berg, Olaf Ziebell, H Siegfried Stiehl. 2002. Texture segmentation performance related to cortical geometry.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00116-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking.

When a target stimulus is embedded in a high contrast surround, the target appears reduced in contrast and is harder to detect, and neural responses in visual cortex are suppressed. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and psychophysics to quantitatively compare these physiological and perceptual effects. Observers performed a contrast discrimination task on a contrast-reversing sinusoidal target grating. The target was either presented in isolation or embedded in a high-contrast surround. While observers performed the task, we also measured fMRI responses as a function of target contrast, both with and without a surround. We found that the surround substantially increased the psychophysical thresholds while reducing fMRI responses. The two data sets were compared, on the basis of the assumption that a fixed response difference is required for correct discrimination, and we found that the psychophysics accounted for 96.5% of the variance in the measured V1 responses. The suppression in visual areas V2 and V3 was stronger, too strong to agree with psychophysics. The good quantitative agreement between psychophysical thresholds and V1 responses suggests V1 as a plausible candidate for mediating surround masking.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing.

Centre-surround receptive field organization is a ubiquitous property in mammalian visual systems, presumably tailored for extracting image features that are differentially distributed over space. In visual motion, this is evident as antagonistic interactions between centre and surround regions of the receptive fields of many direction-selective neurons in visual cortex. In a series of psychophysical experiments we make the counterintuitive observation that increasing the size of a high-contrast moving pattern renders its direction of motion more difficult to perceive and reduces its effectiveness as an adaptation stimulus. We propose that this is a perceptual correlate of centre-surround antagonism, possibly within a population of neurons in the middle temporal visual area. The spatial antagonism of motion signals observed at high contrast gives way to spatial summation as contrast decreases. Evidently, integration of motion signals over space depends crucially on the visibility of those signals, thereby allowing the visual system to register motion information efficiently and adaptively.

Contrast Sensitivity↗