PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12153497

Implementation research for 'evidence-based' guideline development by dietitians: a pilot study to test an instrument.

Abstract

AIM: To improve the quality of dietetic care, dietitians in the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) are encouraged to develop and implement 'evidence-based' guidelines. The aim of this pilot study was to develop and test a questionnaire for implementation research to monitor the process of developing and implementing these guidelines. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed and distributed to 15 dietitians, who have started developing an 'evidence-based' guideline. The questionnaire measures determinants of dietitians' behaviour and the presence of conditions facilitating the development of a guideline. Cronbach's alpha with a cut-off point of 0.7 was used to analyse the internal consistence between the items related to behavioural determinants. A panel of professionals such as a member of staff from the UMCU, a communication expert and project-managers ensured the completeness of the questionnaire. RESULTS: The internal consistency was high (alpha > 0.7) between the items related to the determinants of behaviour. The questionnaire gives a structured overview of factors affecting positively or negatively the process of guideline development. Although dietitians have a positive behaviour towards guideline development, they perceived barriers related to the presence of conditions to develop a guideline. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the applied questionnaire is appropriate for implementation research and has given a structured overview of factors that influence the development of dietetic guidelines by dietitians in the UMCU.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B M Wammes, C A Blom, M Koelen, S D W De Groot, W T A Remijnse-Meester, W A Van Staveren. 2002. Implementation research for 'evidence-based' guideline development by dietitians: a pilot study to test an instrument.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-277x.2002.00368.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗