PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12165869

When should we consider right ventricular support?

Abstract

Ventricular assist systems have become an important tool in the surgical management of acute and chronic heart failure. While indications for left ventricular support ar e well established, criteria for right ventricular support are much less defined. This report summarizes current knowledge on the implantation of right ventricular support in clinical settings of isolated right heart failure, biventricular failure, postcardiotomy failure and post-LVAD right heart failure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Schmid, B Radovancevic. 2002. When should we consider right ventricular support?. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-33103

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Early versus delayed revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and substantial viability: impact on outcome.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and viable myocardium may improve in function and prognosis following revascularization. Delayed revascularization may result in less favorable outcome, and therefore the impact of timing of revascularization on long-term outcome was evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n=85) with ischemic cardiomyopathy and substantial viability (>or=25% of the left ventricle) on dobutamine stress echocardiography underwent surgical revascularization. Based on the waiting time for revascularization, patients were divided into 2 groups: early ( 1 month) revascularization. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed before and 9 to 12 months after revascularization; follow-up data were acquired up to 2 years after revascularization. Hence, 40 patients underwent early (20+/-12 days) and 45 late (85+/-47 days) revascularization. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. Preoperative deaths were 0 in the early and 2 in the late group. Patients with early revascularization remained shorter time in the intensive care unit (2.4+/-1.5 days versus 5.9+/-2.1 days for the late group, P<0.05). Low output syndrome was observed more frequently in the late group (8% versus 22%, P=0.06). On long-term follow-up, mortality (5% versus 20%, P<0.05) and re-hospitalization for heart failure (10% versus 24%, NS) were higher in the late group. LVEF improved from 28+/-9% to 40+/-12% (P<0.05) in the early group and remained unchanged in the late group (27+/-10% versus 25+/-7%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and viable myocardium benefit from early revascularization (with improvement in LVEF and favorable prognosis), whereas delayed revascularization of these patients is associated with worse outcome.

Cardiac Output, Low↗

Oxygen free radical release in human failing myocardium is associated with increased activity of rac1-GTPase and represents a target for statin treatment.

BACKGROUND: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) contribute to the development of heart failure. A potential source of myocardial ROS is the NADPH oxidase, which is regulated by the small GTP-binding protein rac1. Isoprenylation of rac1 can be inhibited by statin therapy. Thus, we examined ROS and rac1 in human failing myocardium and tested their regulation by statins in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: In human left ventricular myocardium from patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), NADPH oxidase activity was increased 1.5-fold compared with nonfailing controls (P<0.05, n=8). In failing myocardium, increased oxidative stress determined by measurements of lipid peroxidation and aconitase activity was associated with increased translocation of rac1 from the cytosol to the membrane. Pull-down assays revealed a 3-fold increase of rac1-GTPase activity in ICM and DCM. In parallel, membrane expression of the NADPH oxidase subunit p47phox, but not p67phox, was upregulated in failing compared with nonfailing myocardium. In right atrial myocardium from patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were prospectively treated with atorvastatin or pravastatin (40 mg/d, 4 weeks), rac1-GTPase activity was decreased to 67.9+/-12% and 65.6+/-13.8% compared with patients without statin (P<0.05, n=8). Both atorvastatin and pravastatin significantly reduced angiotensin II-stimulated but not basal NADPH oxidase activity. CONCLUSIONS: Failing myocardium of patients with DCM and ICM is characterized by upregulation of NADPH oxidase-mediated ROS release associated with increased rac1 activity. Oral statin treatment inhibits myocardial rac1-GTPase activity. These data suggest that extrahepatic effects of statins can be observed in humans and may be beneficial for patients with chronic heart failure.

Cardiac Output, Low↗