PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12181909

[Spatial heterogeneity and forest regeneration].

Youzhi Han·Zhengquan Wang
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The research on spatial heterogeneity is meaningful for forest regeneration dynamics, which is a critical part in the forest ecosystem dynamics. Traditionally, forestry scientists are mainly concentrated their attention to the studies on the process of regeneration. However forests are spatiotemporal heterogeneous. In regeneration, there exists an ecological dynamic process at temporal scale, but also a heterogeneous pattern at spatial scale. Almost of the factors influencing forest regeneration, including both botic and abotic environment, both natural and human disturbances, and both characteristics of tree species and response of tree species to different disturbance agents, are spatially heterogeneous. Discussion on spatial heterogeneity and its effect on regeneration is indispensable for the understanding of the pattern, process and mechanism of forest regeneration. Main research contents and viewpoints of spatial heterogeneity in forest regeneration were summarised on the basis of available literature, and sources of spatial heterogeneity in the process of regeneration were analysed. The response of species to spatial heterogeneity, small-scale spatial heterogeneity and regeneration dynamics, spatial heterogeneity of lights in stand and regeneration pattern, and correlative relationships between the scales of soil heterogeneity and regeneration heterogeneity were reviewed.

Explore related subjects

TreesEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Youzhi Han, Zhengquan Wang. 2002. [Spatial heterogeneity and forest regeneration].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12181909/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

The impact of non-native trees on galling and herbivory in New York City across space and time.

Cities and suburbs frequently plant native and non-native trees as foundation species, with non-natives cultivated in these areas for centuries while remaining non-invasive. Although previous research has found that native trees often host more arthropods, studies have not simultaneously looked across space and time to determine the consistency of tree origin on urban arthropods. We combined varied methods across spatial and temporal scales in New York City to test if native tree leaves consistently have more insect and mite interactions than long-established non-native trees, predicting stronger effect sizes for specialists (galling arthropods) than generalists (herbivory). We examined (1) congeneric species pairs, controlled for growing conditions and stoichiometry in an arboretum, (2) diverse oaks at a botanical garden, (3) community science records across Brooklyn, and (4) herbarium specimens from 1883 through present across the city. Across spatiotemporal scales, we found consistent results. Specialist interactions were striking: contemporary native trees supported numerous galling species, while only one congeneric non-native species hosted any galls. For generalists, contemporary native trees had equivalent to slightly greater herbivory. Over the last century, herbarium records showed that herbivory increased on non-native trees to nearly the level of natives, whereas native trees increased in gall abundance while non-native trees remained rarely galled. Our results demonstrate the impact of tree origin on tree-arthropod interactions in a real-world urban setting, with far fewer galls even when non-native tree species have been cultivated locally for centuries. Our findings will help city planners and property owners confidently choose native trees to promote arthropod biodiversity.

Trees↗
PubMed2026

Tree Killer, Qu'est-ce Que C'est? Insights From Forest Pathogen Genomes.

Forests are central to planetary health but are increasingly challenged by emerging diseases driven by climate change, global trade, and anthropogenic disturbance. Despite the apparent resilience of long-lived, genetically diverse tree hosts, forest ecosystems have repeatedly experienced landscape-level pathogen-driven transformations. Advances in genomics, transcriptomics, and functional biology have transformed our understanding of how fungal and oomycete pathogens interact with their hosts across a continuum of lifestyles, from saprotrophy and necrotrophy to biotrophy. Here, we synthesize insights from comparative and population genomics and functional studies across diverse forest pathosystems to examine the traits that characterize successful tree pathogens. We highlight how lifestyle plasticity, adaptations to woody tissues, vector-mediated transmission, and biotrophic stealth enable pathogens to colonize perennial hosts and persist over long temporal scales. We further examine how genome plasticity, hybridization, and horizontal gene transfer generate adaptive potential that often outpaces host evolutionary responses under current environmental change. Finally, we discuss emerging genomic tools, including biosurveillance, machine learning-based classification, and genome editing, that are beginning to link genotype to phenotype and inform assessments of disease risk. By integrating genomic, ecological, and evolutionary perspectives, this review outlines general principles governing forest pathogen success and identifies priorities for future research aimed at improving understanding, early detection, and management of forest diseases in a changing world.

Trees↗
PubMed2004

[T-square study on spatial pattern and regeneration of Betula albo-sinensis Burkill population on west slope of Jiuding Mountain].

The T-square study of Betula albo-sinensis population on the west slope of Jiuding Mountain showed that the population was mainly in random distribution, and in aggregated distribution in a few lines because of the negative human activities and severe destructions. In this region, the old trees of Betula albo-sinensis population were accounted for about 24%, and the younger trees only accounted for 12%. There exited a huge difficulty in the self-regeneration of Betula albo-sinensis population. Therefore, some measures should be taken to protect the population and to speed up its self-regeneration.

Trees↗