PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12196854

Bone densitometry: applications and limitations.

Zeba Syed·Aliya Khan
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Osteoporosis is clinically diagnosed in its advanced stages, usually following a fracture. Accurate, precise, and noninvasive skeletal assessment is now possible for early detection of osteoporosis at a preclinical stage. Currently, the gold standard in bone mass measurement and fracture prediction is dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the hip and spine. Exponential increases in fracture risk have been observed with small decreases in bone mineral density. Bone mineral density (BMD) should be considered in conjunction with independent clinical risk factors for fracture, including: low body weight, history of postmenopausal fracture, family history of fracture, and poor neuromuscular function. The World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis and osteopenia are appropriate for postmenopausal Caucasian women and are applicable to DEXA assessments at the hip, spine, or forearm. This review explores the relationship between BMD and fracture risk, the principles of bone densitometry interpretation, and the applications as well as the limitations of DEXA technology, and presents cases illustrating common errors seen in the interpretation of DEXA studies.

Explore related subjects

Absorptiometry, PhotonAdultAge DistributionAgedAged, 80 and overBiasBiomarkersBody WeightBone DensityBone RemodelingContraindicationsFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPredictive Value of TestsRacial GroupsRadionuclide ImagingReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zeba Syed, Aliya Khan. 2002. Bone densitometry: applications and limitations.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1701-2163(16)31095-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2004

Differential associations of residual estradiol levels with bone mineral density and serum lipids in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the associations of residual endogenous estradiol (E2) to bone mineral density (BMD) and lipid concentrations in elderly women. METHODS: Subjects consisted of 59 elderly postmenopausal women with vertebral or femoral osteoporosis. BMD was measured at L2-4 and femoral neck by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Residual E2 concentrations were assessed by a sensitive radioimmunoassay. Data were expressed as mean +/- S.E.M. RESULTS: The age of the subjects was 65.2 +/- 0.8 years with 18.9 +/- 1.0 years postmenopausal. The mean residual E2 concentration was 6.0 +/- 0.5 pg/ml. There was a correlation between E2 levels and BMD at L2-4 (r = 0.32, P < 0.01) while no association was found at the femoral neck. The association between E2 and L2-4 BMD persisted after adjusting for years since menopause and body weight (r = 0.33, P < 0.05). With regard to serum lipid concentrations, no association of serum total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol or triglyceride concentrations with residual E2 was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm the role of residual endogenous E2 in the determination of bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The effect of residual E2 appears to be skeletal specific and possess no association with serum lipid concentrations.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2004

Relationship of ultrasonographic endometrial thickness and uterine size to bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the relations of ultrasonographic endometrial thickness and uterine size to bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: Subjects were 200 postmenopausal women (mean age +/- S.D., 57.4 +/- 7.7 years; range, 46-75 years). Age, age at menopause, years since menopause (YSM), height, weight, and body mass index (BMI, weight/height2) were recorded. Endometrial thickness and uterine size (i.e. uterine volume and cross-sectional area) were measured by transvaginal ultrasonography. BMD of the nondominant forearm (one-tenth of the distance from the distal end of the radius) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Relations of these variables to BMD were investigated. RESULTS: BMD was inversely correlated with age and YSM (r = -0.69, P < 0.0001; r = -0.56, P < 0.001, respectively), while was positively correlated with uterine volume, uterine cross-sectional area, and endometrial thickness (r = 0.52, P < 0.001; r = 0.45, P < 0.01; r = 0.32, P < 0.05, respectively). After adjusting for age, YSM, and BMI, BMD was still correlated with uterine volume and uterine cross-section (P < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively), while correlation of endometrial thickness with BMD disappeared. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonographic uterine size shows higher correlation with BMD than endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women. This may be attributable to the fact that uterine size rather than endometrial thickness reflects the duration of estrogen deficiency after menopause.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2004

Osteoporosis assessment strategies for male nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVES: Twenty-five to thirty percent of hip fractures occur in men, and nursing home residents have a 5-10-fold greater fracture risk than community-dwellers. Osteoporosis prevalence in men in long-term care, however, is poorly defined. Our objectives were to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis, as assessed by peripheral bone mineral density (BMD), in a group of institutionalized veterans, and to determine how many men with low BMD had received a prior diagnosis of osteoporosis. METHODS: Subjects were residents in a 740-bed skilled nursing facility (78% men). Male residents (n = 103) competent to give informed consent underwent bilateral calcaneal and forearm BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Prior osteoporosis documentation was sought in medical records. RESULTS: Twenty percent of veterans (95% confidence interval (CI) 12-28%) exhibited calcaneal osteoporosis (T-score < -2.5), and 62% (CI 52-72%) were osteoporotic at the forearm. Forearm and calcaneal BMD were correlated (r = 0.678, P < 0.001). BMD of the left and right forearm, and of left and right calcaneus, were highly correlated (r = 0.880, P < 0.001 and r = 0.931, P < 0.001, respectively). Documentation of osteoporosis existed for one of 20 men with calcaneal osteoporosis and four of 59 men with forearm osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis was prevalent but poorly documented in institutionalized veterans. Discordance in T-scores between forearm and heel was similar to that reported in other studies. The broad range of T-scores among subjects suggests that peripheral BMD measurement may be useful for clinical fracture risk stratification. Correlation among skeletal sites indicates that measuring a single site may be practical.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗