PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12210944

Perfusion quantification using Gaussian process deconvolution.

Abstract

The quantification of perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) requires deconvolution to obtain the residual impulse response function (IRF). In this work, a method using the Gaussian process for deconvolution (GPD) is proposed. The fact that the IRF is smooth is incorporated as a constraint in the method. The GPD method, which automatically estimates the noise level in each voxel, has the advantage that model parameters are optimized automatically. The GPD is compared to singular value decomposition (SVD) using a common threshold for the singular values, and to SVD using a threshold optimized according to the noise level in each voxel. The comparison is carried out using artificial data as well as data from healthy volunteers. It is shown that GPD is comparable to SVD with a variable optimized threshold when determining the maximum of the IRF, which is directly related to the perfusion. GPD provides a better estimate of the entire IRF. As the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) increases or the time resolution of the measurements increases, GPD is shown to be superior to SVD. This is also found for large distribution volumes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I K Andersen, A Szymkowiak, C E Rasmussen, L G Hanson, J R Marstrand, H B W Larsson, L K Hansen. 2002. Perfusion quantification using Gaussian process deconvolution.. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10213

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeted prefrontal cortical activation with bifrontal ECT.

The anatomical brain regions involved in the therapeutic and adverse actions of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) are unknown. Previous studies suggest that bifrontal vs. bitemporal ECT differ in therapeutic efficacy and cognitive side effects. We therefore performed cerebral blood flow (CBF) imaging during bitemporal vs. bifrontal ECT-induced seizures to identify regions crucial for the differences between these treatments. Patients with major depression, undergoing bitemporal or bifrontal ECT, were studied. Ictal-interictal SPECT images were analyzed with statistical parametric mapping for bitemporal (n=11 image pairs in 8 patients) and bifrontal (n=4 image pairs in 2 patients) ECT-induced seizures to identify regions of ictal CBF changes. Bifrontal ECT was found to cause increases in CBF in prefrontal and anterior cingulate regions. Bitemporal ECT, however, caused CBF increases in the lateral frontal cortex and in the anterior temporal lobes. In bifrontal ECT, a greater increase in prefrontal activation, while sparing the temporal lobes, may result in a better therapeutic response and fewer adverse effects on memory than bitemporal ECT.

Cerebrovascular Circulation↗