PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12235731

[Differential type 2 diabetes therapy based on pathophysiological aspects].

Abstract

Type 2 Diabetes is characterized by a deficit in early insulin secretion and increased insulin resistance. Based on the measurement of fasting and 2 h postprandial blood glucose a simple typing of hyperglycemia is possible in isolated fasting hyperglycemia (IFH), isolated postprandial hyperglycemia (IPH) and combined hyperglycemia (CH). IFH is predominantly associated with insulin resistance whereas in IPH a more pronounced insulin deficit is found. This and other simple parameters such as BMI, comorbidities and age are the basis of differential therapy with OAD if best efforts with life style modification fail to reach the target values of the lipid triad. Patients with IFH profit particularly from metformin and long acting sulfonylureas (glimepiride, glibenclamide). Patients with IPH are candidates for prandial antidiabetics (AGI, nateglinide, repaglinide). Antihyperglycemic agents such as metformin and AGI bear no risk of hyperglycemia and reduce body weight. Prandial insulin secretagogues have lower risk of weight gain and hypoglycemia than long acting sulfonylureas. They are therefore beneficial in obese patients and the elderly. The same principles are valid for combination treatment. With exception of insulin secretagogues all OAD can be combined if monotherapy fails to reach the target levels of the gluco-triad. Instead of a stepwise treatment algorithm an individualized therapy based on pathophysiology and comorbidities taking into account the global risk seems to be beneficial.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Hanefeld, S Fischer. 2002. [Differential type 2 diabetes therapy based on pathophysiological aspects].. https://doi.org/10.1024/0040-5930.59.8.393

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical evaluation of the eBsensor hand-held blood glucose monitoring system.

BACKGROUND: Home glucose monitoring system is increasingly recognized as an important tool for glycemic control. We evaluated the clinical performance of the eBsensor glucose monitoring system. METHODS: Fingertip capillary blood glucose concentrations from 282 subjects were measured using eBsensor glucose monitoring system and compared against predicate devices and the Yellow Springs Instruments (YSI) 2300 blood glucose analyzer. Accuracy and precision of the eBsensor glucose monitoring system were assessed using several methods. The comparative study between the eBsensor and 2 currently marketed monitoring systems was performed. RESULTS: The 282 eBsensor readings covered a wide range from 2.6 to 24.4 mmol/l. Deming regression and Pearson correlation analyses showed a linear relationship between the eBsensor readings and the YSI reference method (eBsensor=0.9496 YSI+0.4127 mmol/l; r=0.98). Error Grid analysis demonstrated that 100% of the eBsensor readings in clinically acceptable zones A and B. The CVs for the 6 lots of strips were within the satisfactory interval (<6%). The comparative study showed that the eBsensor readings correlated well with the OneTouch Ultra values (r=0.97) and the Glucocard II values (r=0.97). CONCLUSIONS: eBsensor is a reliable glucose monitoring system which provides high accurate and precise glucose readings over a wide range of glucose concentrations.

Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring↗

[Costs of diabetes mellitus type 2 and self measurement of blood glucose in Germany].

UNLABELLED: It is extremely difficult to assess the prevalence and the total costs of diabetes mellitus for the German health care system. The last sound assessment of the total costs is based on the CODE-2 study, although this study reflects the situation in 1998. METHODS: In this paper we assess again the total costs of diabetes mellitus type 2 and self measurement of blood glucose (SMBG) for the German healthcare system, based on the analysis of a recently published retrospective, multicentre trial dealing with the impact of SMBG on long-term patient outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, yearly costs for the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2 and its complications amount to Euro 3 196,-per patient. This equals 4.6% to 8.2% of the German healthcare expenditure, in relation to the estimated prevalence of the disease in Germany. The cost difference between the cohorts with and without SMBG was not essential (Euro 290,-higher costs in the cohort with SMBG). CONCLUSIONS: From a public health standpoint, prevention of diabetes mellitus or at least prevention of its complications by optimising glucose metabolism should be given highest priority in times of limited resources for healthcare. SMBG is perhaps a valuable tool to achieve this target.

Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring↗