PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12236492

In-line pressurized-fluid extraction-solid-phase extraction for determining phenolic compounds in grapes.

Abstract

A new method of pressurized-fluid extraction coupled in-line with solid-phase extraction has been used for the extraction of phenolic compounds from grapes. The full extraction method is performed under an inert atmosphere. Five different solvents have been assayed using different extraction pressures and temperatures. Using two extraction stages with two different solvents, water and methanol, quantitative recovery for most of the assayed compounds has been found in the second extract. Only the most polar phenolic compound, gallic acid, was found distributed in both extracts. The application to real samples allows for a clean-up of the extracts. Cinnamic esters like caftaric acid, cis and trans-coutaric acids were found only in the methanolic extract. The reproducibility for the new method was measured using both an inert solid spiked with standards and grapes. Using between 202 and 424 microg of spiked standards, the resulting relative standard deviations were less than 5%, with the exception of gallic acid (RSD=13%). For grapes, the resulting RSD were 11% for trans-coutaric acid, 10% for caftaric acid and 6% for cis-coutaric acid.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Miguel Palma, Zulema Piñeiro, Carmelo G Barroso. 2002-08-30. In-line pressurized-fluid extraction-solid-phase extraction for determining phenolic compounds in grapes.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00823-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Ultrasonic destruction of phenol and substituted phenols: a review of current research.

Phenol and some of its derivatives such as chlorophenol and nitrophenol have received considerable attention from environmental scientists and engineers, due to their undesirable effects in the water environment, where they end up as a result of improper disposal methods. As a consequence, research has been conducted all around the world with the common goal of reducing their concentrations to allowable limits or converting them to non-toxic, non-hazardous forms that may easily be handled by natural decay processes. Some of this research has focused on ultrasonic techniques, which currently appears to present a convenient but as yet unproven method for large scale water remediation. The goal of this study is to identify and review some of these studies that are directly related with the use of ultrasound in decontaminating effluents with phenol residuals and to summarize the main points of interest and problems encountered.

Phenols↗

Application of water-soluble polymers as modifiers in electrophoretic analysis of phenols.

A review of application of water-soluble cationic, anionic and nonionic polymers as pseudostationary phases in capillary electrophoresis (CE) and micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MEKC) is presented. The effect of the structure of the polymers on the selectivity and efficiency of separation is discussed. A novel specially designed cationic polymer, 2,10-ionene, has been used for the separation of phenols. The polymer has hydrophilic and hydrophobic parts in its backbone. The polymer shows the best selectivity as a modifier in capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE)-mode, which allows the selective determination of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic phenols.

Phenols↗

Determination of phenols in landfill leachate-contaminated groundwaters by solid-phase extraction.

A solid-phase extraction method for phenols in landfill leachates was developed and optimized in order to solve the expected and observed problems associated with an anaerobic matrix containing high concentrations of salts and organic matter. Isolute ENV+ cartridges exhibited the best retention of phenols of the four sorbents examined, and was the only cartridge which a 1 L leachate sample could pass through. With the other cartridges, clogging made this impossible. The final method, which included 27 different phenols, gave detection limits of <0.1 microg/L (drinking water concentration limit for pesticides) for most phenols (25), and for 12 phenols <0.01 microg/L. Recovery rates (determined for four concentrations in the range 1-25 microg/L, two replicates of each) were in the range 79-104% (SD 1-12%), except for phenol (26+/-1.3%) and 2-methoxyphenol (62+/-4.2%). Up to 12 different phenols could be identified in leachates from three Danish landfills, ranging in concentration from 0.01 to 29 microg/L, which is at the lower end of the concentration range usually found for phenols in landfill leachates (sub-microg/L to mg/L).

Phenols↗