PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1227690

Reentry in the atrium.

Abstract

Studies with isolated atrial preparations of the rabbit showed that the occurrence of a single early premature beat may cause reentry not only in nodal tissue (SA node and AV node) but also in working myocardial tissue. In the SA node an early premature beat will cause a reentrant activation of the atrium only when the SA node is driven by an ectopic pacemaker. If the SA node is discharging spontaneously, no reentry could be demonstrated. In this situation the early impulse can not reach the center of the SA node because of a sinoatrial entrance block. Since the AV node fibers normally do not discharge spontaneously, an atrial premature beat may find an alternative route through the node and reenter the atrium. Such a reentrant beat or echo beat can start a tachycardia based on a circus movement of the impulse through the AV node. A supraventricular tachycardia can be started too by an early premature beat in the isolated left atrium, containing only working myocardial fibers and no slow conducting fibers as the nodal fibers are. By careful mapping the spread of activation during the premature beat and the subsequent beats of the tachycardia, a unidirectional block of the impulse of the premature beat was demonstrated. The impulse then turned around and invaded the blocked area retrogradely and reentered the area where it originated. This circus movement of the premature impulse was maintained during the subsequent tachycardial beats, showing that even in a small area of atrial muscle, containing no anatomical obstacle, a circus tachycardia can take place. To describe this kind of circus movement a new model (the "leading circle" concept) is introduced and briefly discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F I Bonke, M A Allessie, L N Bouman. 1975. Reentry in the atrium.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1227690/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

AAM-based segmentation for imaging cardiac electrophysiology.

OBJECTIVES: Activation time (AT) imaging from electrocardiographic (ECG) mapping data has been developing for several years. By coupling 4-dimensional volume data (3D + time) the electrical sequence can be computed non-invasively. In this paper an approach for extracting the ventricular and atrial blood masses for structurally normal hearts by using cine-gated short-axis data obtained via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is introduced. METHODS: The blood masses are extracted by employing Active Appearance Models (AAMs). The ventricular blood masses are segmented, applying the AAMs after providing apex cordis and base of the heart in the volume data, whereas the more complex geometry of the atria requires a more specific attempt. On account of this the atrium was divided into three divisions of appearance, where the images of the volume data in the related divisions have a maximum affinity. The first division reaches from the base of the heart to initial visibility of the upper and left lower pulmonary vein. The second division up from there to the last occurrence and the third division from there to the end of the visibility of the right upper and lower pulmonary vein. After extracting the cardiac blood masses the result gets triangulated and remeshed for activation time imaging. RESULTS: With this method the cardiac models of eight patients were extracted and the AT imaging approach was applied to single-beat ECG data of atrial and ventricular depolarization. CONCLUSION: The advantage of the proposed AAM approach is that only a few initial parameters have to be set. Therefore, the approach can be integrated into a processing pipeline that works semi-automatically. The extracted models can be used for further investigations.

Atrial Function↗

Electrocardiogram differentiation of benign early repolarization versus acute myocardial infarction by emergency physicians and cardiologists.

OBJECTIVES: ST-segment elevation (STE) related to benign early repolarization (BER), a common normal variant, can be difficult to distinguish from acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The authors compared the electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretations of these two entities by emergency physicians (EPs) and cardiologists. METHODS: Twenty-five cases (13 BER, 12 AMI) of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain were identified. Criteria for BER required four of the following: 1) widespread STE (precordial greater than limb leads), 2) J-point elevation, 3) concavity of initial up-sloping portion of ST segment, 4) notching or irregular contour of J point, and 5) prominent, concordant T waves. Additional BER criteria were 1) stable ECG pattern, 2) negative cardiac injury markers, and 3) normal cardiac stress test or angiography. AMI criteria were 1) regional STE, 2) positive cardiac injury markers, and 3) identification of culprit coronary artery by angiography in less than eight hours of presentation. The 25 ECGs were distributed to 12 EPs and 12 cardiologists (four in academic medicine, four in community practice, and four in community academics [health maintenance organization] in each physician group). The physicians were informed of the patients' age, gender, and race, and they then interpreted the ECGs as BER or AMI. Undercalls (AMI misdiagnosed as BER) and overcalls (BER misdiagnosed as AMI) were calculated for each physician group. RESULTS: Cardiologists correctly interpreted 90% of ECGs, and EPs correctly interpreted 81% of ECGs. The proportion of undercalls (missed AMI/total AMI) was 2.8% for cardiologists (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.09% to 5.5%) compared with 9.7% for EPs (95% CI = 4.8% to 14.6%) (p = 0.02). The proportion of overcalls (missed BER/total BER) was 17.3% for cardiologists (95% CI = 11.4% to 23.3%) versus 27.6% for EPs (95% CI = 20.6% to 34.6%) (p = 0.03). The mean number of years in practice was 19.8 for cardiologists (95% CI = 19 to 20.5) and 11 years for EPs (95% CI = 10.5 to 12.0) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although correct interpretation was high in both groups, cardiologists, who had significantly more years of practice, had fewer misinterpretations than EPs in distinguishing BER from AMI electrocardiographically.

Atrial Function↗