PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12296841

Ethical considerations in researching user views.

Abstract

Researching user views has become a central plank of UK cancer and palliative care policy, not least because it is recognized that current systems for treatment reflect inadequately the experiences and concerns of cancer patients. This paper examines the process of accessing user views about cancer and palliative care from an ethical perspective, drawing by way of example on a study of outcomes associated with Macmillan nursing. A moral theory framework is used to discuss some of the issues involved in trying to achieve ethically sound practice and some essentially political issues that frame the process of accessing users' views are highlighted. The paper recommends that models of research be developed for accessing user views that are congruent with the values and philosophies of supportive and palliative care. This requires striking a fine balance between the ethical duties of providing care and support, nurturing independence and autonomy, and achieving research outcomes that are rigorous while also being accessible and meaningful to users. It also requires developing an understanding of the social, political and economic context of research enquiry with users.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Seymour, J Skilbeck. 2002. Ethical considerations in researching user views.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00342.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗