PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12345152

Sterilization. Determining a good candidate.

Abstract

After 4 years, 10% of the 1800 low-income women in a 5-year study felt some regrets after the procedure. Although each individual is different, if a woman has 1 or more of the following characteristics, she may not be a good candidate for sterilization: under age 30; has few or no children; not involved in a stable relationship; made the decision to be sterilized alone and with minimal reflection; recently experienced a personal life crisis; feels sterilization will solve a sexual problem; expectations about sterilization are unrealistic; pressured by others to be sterilized. Although women who have had the procedure sometimes experience regret, other women regret not having been sterilized. Approximately 40% of the women who decided for sterilization but had their intentions blocked expressed regret at the short-term follow-up, and one-third reported regret at the second interview 4 years later. Also, women who chose not to be sterilized and then experienced a subsequent pregnancy were 7 times more likely to express regret than women who went through with the procedure. To counsel a woman who wants no more children but does not want sterilization, ask her how she would feel if she became pregnant again, and try to determine how badly she does not want to be pregnant, says Libby Antarsh, PhD, director of US programs for the Association of Voluntary Surgical Contraception in New York City. Also, make sure she has accurate information about other methods of birth control, she says.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1993. Sterilization. Determining a good candidate.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12345152/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparing the quality of oral anticoagulant management by anticoagulation clinics and by family physicians: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that better outcomes are achieved when anticoagulation is managed by anticoagulation clinics rather than by family physicians. We carried out a randomized controlled trial to evaluate these 2 models of anticoagulant care. METHODS: We randomly allocated patients who were expected to require warfarin sodium for 3 months either to anticoagulation clinics located in 3 Canadian tertiary hospitals or to their family physician practices. We evaluated the quality of oral anticoagulant management by comparing the proportion of time that the international normalized ratio (INR) of patients receiving warfarin sodium was within the target therapeutic range +/- 0.2 INR units (expanded therapeutic range) while they were managed in anticoagulation clinics as opposed to family physicians' care over 3 months. We measured the rates of thromboembolic and major hemorrhagic events and patient satisfaction in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Of the 221 patients enrolled, 112 were randomly assigned to anticoagulation clinics and 109 to family physicians. The INR values of patients who were managed by anticoagulation clinics were within the expanded therapeutic range 82% of the time versus 76% of the time for those managed by family physicians (p = 0.034). High-risk INR values (defined as being < 1.5 or > 5.0) were more commonly observed in patients managed by family physicians (40%) than in patients managed by anticoagulation clinics (30%, p = 0.005). More INR measurements were performed by family physicians than by anticoagulation clinics (13 v. 11, p = 0.001). Major bleeding events (2 [2%] v. 1 [1%]), thromboembolic events (1 [1%] v. 2 [2%]) and deaths (5 [4%] v. 6 [6%]) occurred at a similar frequency in the anticoagulation clinic and family physician groups respectively. Of the 170 (77%) patients who completed the patient satisfaction questionnaire, more were satisfied when their anticoagulant management was managed through anticoagulation clinics than by their family physicians (p = 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Anticoagulation clinics provided better oral anticoagulant management than family physicians, but the differences were relatively modest.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗

Telemedicine. Straight to video.

Videoconference sessions involving patient, GP and hospital consultant have speeded up assessment and reduced the need for referrals. The health centre claims there is potential for a 75 per cent cut in outpatient clinic appointments. The system currently covers cardiology and peripheral vascular disease in one GP practice but research is planned on extending it across the primary care trust.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗