PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12346248

Visualizing changing social structure from a census.

Abstract

"In this paper it is shown how new visualization techniques are being used to analyze the first results of the British 1991 Census and other large data sets." The focus is on new ways to show how localities develop over time. The author suggests that this cannot be done effectively using traditional quantitative techniques. "Pictures are needed to show how different processes occur in different places, and holistic patterns need also to be seen without generalizing out the detail. Neither traditional thematic mapping nor commercial geographic information systems can do this well. Spatial visualization is an alternative approach in which the researchers choose what they wish to see and how they wish to view it. Many problems require new methods of visualization for their exploration. A new census presents us not only with new statistics, but also with the opportunity and impetus to develop radically different ways of envisioning information to reveal more fully the human facts contained within a mass of social statistics."

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Dorling. 1995. Visualizing changing social structure from a census.. https://doi.org/10.1068/a270353

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An evidence-based national quality measurement and reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine and evidence-based guidelines are widely supported among physicians and other health professionals, although practice may still fall far short of the ideas contained in the concept. Insufficient attention has been given to using the concepts of evidence-based practice in the selection of measures, diffusion of innovations, and adoption of quality improvement (QI) techniques. OBJECTIVES: To describe in greater detail how evidence serves as a foundation for a national quality measurement and reporting system (NQMRS) and to consider the different types of evidence that will be used. The role of the NQMRS in adding to the evidence base is explored. RESEARCH DESIGN: A descriptive, conceptual discussion. RESULTS: Many different types of evidence are available for use in the NQMRS. The NQMRS could add substantial new evidence on how well different approaches to quality measurement, reporting, and improvement work and also expand the evidence base on the effectiveness of clinical interventions for which efficacy has been established. CONCLUSIONS: An evidence-based NQMRS will require substantial leadership from government and private entities. The gains from a greater focus on evidence are expected to be found in accelerating QI. Reliance on evidence-based approaches should not be used to stifle innovation.

Censuses↗

Random sample (DOPPS) versus census-based (registry) approaches to kidney disease research.

This review describes advantages and limitations of registries that base their analyses on the census of all patients. Registries may utilize the random sample approach to enrich their data for more detailed and informative research. The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Pattern Study (DOPPS) and its random sample approach is discussed here in detail, with examples on the value of this method. The DOPPS is currently being expanded to allow for even more valuable studies. This methodology can also be applied to large countries that do not have an existing registry, as it is an effective way of collecting detailed information at a relatively low cost that is representative of the country or population as a whole.

Censuses↗

Waiting time information services: what are the implications of waiting list behaviour for their design?

In some countries, patients requiring elective surgery can access comparative waiting time information for various surgical units. What someone can deduce from this information will depend upon how the statistics are derived, and how waiting lists behave. However, empirical analyses of waiting list behaviour are scarce. This study analysed three years of waiting list data collected at one hospital in Sydney, Australia. The results highlight various issues that raise questions about using particular waiting time statistics to make inferences about patient waiting times. In particular, the results highlight the considerable variation in behaviour that can exist between surgeons in the same specialty, and that can occur over time.

Censuses↗