PubMed · 12346761
Judgment, 10 October 1986.
Abstract
While married to the defendant wife, the plaintiff husband agreed to have a child by artificial insemination of the wife with the semen of another man. After the couple was divorced, the husband brought a successful action to disclaim paternity of the child born as a result of the artificial insemination. He then attempted to have support payments agreed to in the divorce settlement set aside since he was not the father of the child. The Court ruled against him, holding that the child was a third party beneficiary of the contract between the couple to have a child through artificial insemination; as such it was owed an obligation of support by the plaintiff, no matter what the status of the child's paternity.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Germany, Federal Republic of. Landgericht, Duisberg. 1987. Judgment, 10 October 1986.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346761/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.