PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12347693

Making it happen: the programme. Breaking the rules.

Abstract

I have always believed that women should be given equal recognition and treatment. My upbringing, observation and experience taught me that I would get nowhere unless I broke the rules. Equal recognition happens only when women are consciously encouraged to reflect and led to understand their worth by looking at their own lives. I use the strategy of sharing my own experience to open dialogue with rural women. For example, in India I helped poor tribal women to go to the Tribal Commissioner when they were being cheated out of tribal rights over land. Appealing to the law makes women stronger, more assertive, and more aware of their rights. Land titles were restored to a few women and they became leaders and supported other women in the same predicament. This change was possible because of a commitment of resources, the attitude of the authorities, and my presence as an Oxfam project officer. As a woman manager I am proud to have helped to create an office environment which in sensitive to women's needs and the way women operate. I have consciously fostered the space for a diversity of ways of working. I can do that because of my management position, and support from other structures, like AGRA and the Gender Unit. It has not been easy as a woman manager in a male dominated, technical program, and as a non-white woman from the South. But with decision-making authority it has been possible to keep women's participation and gender on the agenda.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V Padmanabhan. 1996. Making it happen: the programme. Breaking the rules.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12347693/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Costs of surgeries in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Surgical care is essential for achieving global health equity, yet low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face major gaps in access and planning, partly due to limited evidence on the costs and resource requirements of surgical interventions. Understanding these costs is vital for designing efficient and equitable health systems. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review (covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, EconLit and grey literature) to identify studies reporting the costs of surgeries in LMICs from January 2000 to June 2023. Minor and major surgical procedures were considered, focusing on therapeutic procedures (excluding diagnostic interventions). Studies that clearly identified, quantified and costed hospital resources and services deployed in the provision of surgical care, and included at least two of the surgical production factors (ie, consumables, diagnostics, personnel, infrastructure and overhead) in the costing were included. Costs were standardised to 2023 International dollars (I$) for comparability. RESULTS: A total of 74 studies from 29 countries met the inclusion criteria, with 210 cost estimates across 65 procedure groups. Costs varied widely: from I$1.54 for a caesarean section in Tanzania to I$618 098 for paediatric cataract surgery in Zambia. Full costing studies reported higher estimates than partial costing studies. Most studies (60%) originated from upper-middle-income countries, with limited data (10%) from low-income settings. CONCLUSION: This review provides a reference list of surgical procedure costs across LMICs, highlighting considerable cost variation by procedure, specialty and country. The findings underscore the need for better-quality, standardised cost data-especially from low-income countries-to inform national surgical plans, universal health coverage benefit packages and reimbursement policies.

Developing Countries↗