PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12357687

[Current techniques for primary flexor tendon repair].

Abstract

Flexor tendon lacerations still represent a challenging problem to hand surgeons, particularly in zone 2. There has been a considerable improvement in therapeutic modalities during the past 30 years, following a better understanding of the tendon healing process. It is now universally accepted that flexor tendon repair must be performed in emergency, by mean of a direct primary suture, and followed by a immediate rehabilitation protocol. More recently, the benefits of early active motion has been demonstrated. Early axial loading of the repair enhances intrinsic callus formation, reduces peritendinous adhesion, and could attenuate the fragilization of the callus during the first three weeks. However, active motion generates a heavier stress on the repair. The initial resistance of the repair thus appeared to be the critical point. This has motivated a large number of investigations about the suture technique itself, with in vitro and in vivo evaluations. The results of these studies did precise the concept of "locking" and "grasping" sutures, and demonstrated the superiority of four strands sutures. These experimental results cannot be ignored by surgeons dealing with flexor tendon repairs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Dubert. 2002. [Current techniques for primary flexor tendon repair].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1297-3203(02)00116-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Fracture healing assessment comparing stiffness measurements using radiographs.

Based on published reports, we presumed radiographs would be unreliable as a sole measure of fracture healing. To confirm this presumption we correlated radiographic fracture healing assessments with fracture stiffness measurements. We showed 100 plain radiographs of fractures with corresponding fracture stiffness measurements to 92 observers. The radiographs were shown twice to assess intraobserver variation. Observers were divided into three groups and asked to determine whether each fracture had healed (union corresponded to a fracture stiffness greater than 15 nm/degrees). Group 1 based fracture healing on the general appearance of healing. Groups 2 and 3 assessed fracture healing based on the number of cortices bridged by callus. In Group 2, the fracture was considered healed if two or more cortices were bridged on both radiographic views and in Group 3 if three or more cortices were bridged by callus. All groups performed poorly. There was no difference in terms of correct prediction of healing between methods, although there was a trend toward more reliability with cortical callus bridging assessment. We found substantial intraobserver variability, which improved using cortical bridging methods. Observers were less reliable at predicting healing when there was a metaphyseal extension to a diaphyseal fracture.

Bony Callus↗

Computational simulation of fracture healing: influence of interfragmentary movement on the callus growth.

Bone fractures heal through a complex process involving several cellular events. This healing process can serve to study factors that control tissue growth and differentiation from mesenchymal stem cells. The mechanical environment at the fracture site is one of the factors influencing the healing process and controls size and differentiation patterns in the newly formed tissue. Mathematical models can be useful to unravel the complex relation between mechanical environment and tissue formation. In this study, we present a mathematical model that predicts tissue growth and differentiation patterns from local mechanical signals. Our aim was to investigate whether mechanical stimuli, through their influence on stem cell proliferation and chondrocyte hypertrophy, predict characteristic features of callus size and geometry. We found that the model predicted several geometric features of fracture calluses. For instance, callus size was predicted to increase with increasing movement. Also, increases in size were predicted to occur through increase in callus diameter but not callus length. These features agree with experimental observations. In addition, spatial and temporal tissue differentiation patterns were in qualitative agreement with well-known experimental results. We therefore conclude that local mechanical signals can probably explain the shape and size of fracture calluses.

Bony Callus↗