PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12369202

Lactic acid bacteria in a changing legislative environment.

Abstract

The benefits of using lactic acid bacteria in the food chain, both through direct consumption and production of ingredients, are increasingly recognised by the food industry and consumers alike. The regulatory environment surrounding these products is diverse, covering foods and food ingredients, processing aids, feed additives and dietary supplements. On a global basis, there are different approaches taken by the various regulatory authorities. While in Europe, the national legislation is gradually being harmonized, predominantly through the Novel Foods Regulation, there is still a wide disparity between the stringency of regulation of microbial products fed to animals and the comparatively relaxed approach to 'non-novel' microbial products intended for human consumption. In the United States, the onus is on self-regulation of the manufacturer, with the Generally Recognised As Safe (GRAS) and Dietary Supplement Health Education Act (DSHEA) notification schemes encouraging industry to be more open about the ingredients they market. In Japan, the Foods for Special Health Use system continues to gain recognition as more products are approved, and is a potential model for other countries in regulating functional foods. Despite the different approaches to regulating these products, safety of microorganisms such as lactic acid bacteria in the food chain is paramount in all countries. This paper discusses the regulatory requirements of microbial products, predominantly lactic acid bacteria within the global markets, focusing mainly on the developments in Europe.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jean Feord. 2002. Lactic acid bacteria in a changing legislative environment.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12369202/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Vitamin and mineral supplements for cancer prevention: issues and evidence.

Trials of nutritional supplements for cancer prevention must overcome a variety of challenges not shared in the usual paradigm of pharmaceutical agents for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Unlike for cardiovascular disease, for cancer we typically do not have well-established causal risk factors as targets for intervention. Also, for most likely cancer interventions, the expected time to achieve an effect is much longer, more variable, and far less well understood than for cardiovascular disease, and the progression of pathophysiology is much harder-or impossible-to follow, in contrast with imaging for progression of atherosclerosis in cardiovascular disease. Also, cancers at various sites have a wide range of etiologies. The optimal age for intervention, best dose, and duration needed to test nutritional agents for cancer prevention are largely unknown, making null findings hard to interpret. Unlike with drugs, baseline nutritional status can be critical. Moreover, because the nutritional agents are often readily available, adherence in control groups in trials can be impaired. Several gene-nutrient and nutrient-nutrient interactions have been identified that could affect trial results. Some studies suggest that particular nutrients may be effective only in subgroups defined by genotypes or by nutritional status of another nutrient. All these challenges must be considered in planning informative trials. Long-term prospective cohort studies, especially with repeated measures and high follow-up, can provide useful data for planning trials as well as the basis for rational recommendations while awaiting trial results or in settings where trials may be infeasible.

Dietary Supplements↗

Clinical trials of vitamin and mineral supplements for cancer prevention.

Approximately 20-30% of Americans consume multivitamin supplements daily, indicating high public interest in the prevention of cancer and other chronic diseases through a nutrition-based approach. Although several bioactive food components, including vitamins and minerals, have been investigated for their ability to affect cancer risk, few large, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of multivitamins with cancer as the primary endpoint have been performed. The results of most large-scale trials of multivitamin supplements (combinations of > or = 2 vitamins and minerals) to prevent cancer have been mixed. The Linxian General Population and Dysplasia trials found a decreased risk of cancer, particularly stomach cancer, for participants taking a multivitamin supplement, but this was in a borderline-deficient population in China. Two trials, the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study and the beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial, found an increased risk of lung cancer among male cigarette smokers or asbestos-exposed persons taking beta-carotene-a surprising result, considering that most epidemiologic studies have suggested that consumption of fruit and vegetables appears to lower cancer risk. To clarify the effects of multivitamin supplements, several large randomized clinical trials are underway, including the Physicians' Health Study II, the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial, and a European study, Supplémentation en Vitamines et Minéraux Antioxydants (SU.VI. MAX). Because epidemiologic studies generally evaluate foods rather than specific bioactive food components, a systematic approach to determining how combinations of vitamins and minerals may interact to ameliorate cancer risk is necessary to further our understanding of the potential benefits and risks of supplement use.

Dietary Supplements↗

Inflammation, cancer, and targets of ginseng.

Chronic inflammation is associated with a high cancer risk. At the molecular level, free radicals and aldehydes, produced during chronic inflammation, can induce deleterious gene mutation and posttranslational modifications of key cancer-related proteins. Other products of inflammation, including cytokines, growth factors, and transcription factors such as nuclear factor kappaB, control the expression of cancer genes (e.g., suppressor genes and oncogenes) and key inflammatory enzymes such as inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2. These enzymes in turn directly influence reactive oxygen species and eicosanoid levels. The procancerous outcome of chronic inflammation is increased DNA damage, increased DNA synthesis, cellular proliferation, disruption of DNA repair pathways and cellular milieu, inhibition of apoptosis, and promotion of angiogenesis and invasion. Chronic inflammation is also associated with immunosuppression, which is a risk factor for cancer. Current treatment strategies for reactive species overload diseases are frequently aimed at treating or preventing the cause of inflammation. Although these strategies have led to some progress in combating reactive species overload diseases and associated cancers, exposure often occurs again after eradication, treatment to eradicate the cause fails, or the treatment has long-term side effects. Therefore, the identification of molecules and pathways involved in chronic inflammation and cancer is critical to the design of agents that may help in preventing the progression of reactive species overload disease and cancer associated with disease progression. Here, we use ginseng as an example of an antiinflammatory molecule that targets many of the key players in the inflammation-to-cancer sequence.

Dietary Supplements↗