PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12371737

Hand decontamination: what interventions improve compliance?

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis units have traditionally been classified as high-risk areas in relation to infection control. Hand decontamination is the fundamental infection control practice, although this is not always performed optimally Deficiencies in the technique, frequency and appropriateness of this vital practice are frequently reported in health care journals. A literature search was carried out to determine what interventions improve compliance with hand decontamination practice. METHOD: A literature search was carried out of electronic databases from 1988-2000. Forty articles matched the key search words. When inclusion/exclusion criteria had been applied, seven primary research articles were found to be suitable. Appropriate tools were used to critically analyse the research. The findings were then synthesised into similar themes. FINDINGS: The interventions used in the seven articles utilised a combination of staff and patient education, feedback and motivational interventions to improve compliance. The evidence showed that these interventions met with different degrees of success. Multiple interventions were generally more successful than individual efforts. The improvement in hand decontamination practice often fell back to base line measurements after the intervention had ceased. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings can cautiously be used to improve practice. A combination of continuous, innovative education and motivation should improve and maintain this important skill.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Hinkin. Hand decontamination: what interventions improve compliance?. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6686.2002.tb00227.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗