PubMed · 12374039
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Wellington J Rody, Eustáquio Afonso Araújo. 2002. Extraction decision-making wigglegram.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12374039/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Early treatment for Class II malocclusion was undertaken with the objective of correcting skeletal disproportion by altering the growth pattern. A case of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion in the mixed dentition was corrected to Class I molar relationship using orthopedic cervical headgear, with nonextraction edgewise therapy. Cephalometric analysis indicated a reduction in the maxillomandibular discrepancy (ANB) correcting the Class II malocclusion to Class I malocclusion. The treatment showed that this was achieved by downward displacement and inhibition of the forward growth of the maxilla and growth of the mandible. There was no downward rotation of the mandible nor maxillary first molar extrusion. There was improvement in the jaw relationship.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the significance for sex determination of the measurement of the area formed by the xerographic projection of 3 craniometric points related to the mastoid process: the porion, asterion, and mastoidale points. METHOD: Sixty skulls, 30 male and 30 female, were analyzed. A xerographic copy of each side of the skull was obtained. On each xerographic copy, the craniometric points were marked to demarcate a triangle. The area (mm ) of the demarcated triangle for each side of the skull (right (D) and left (E) sides) was determined, and the total value of these measures (T) was calculated. RESULTS: Concerning the right area of the male and female skulls, 60% of the values overlapped; for the left area, 51.67% overlapped, and for the total area, 36.67% overlapped. The analysis of the differences between the sexes in the areas studied was significant for the 3 areas. Regarding the total area, which is the preferred measurement because of the asymmetry between the sides of the skull, the value of the mean was 1505.32 mm for male skulls, which was greater than the maximum value obtained in the female skulls. The value of the mean for female skulls was 1221.24 mm , less than the minimum value obtained for the male skulls. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significant result in the 3 studied areas, (D), (E), and (T). The total area values show less overlapping of values between the sexes, and therefore can be used for sexing human skulls. For the population studied, values of the total area that were greater than or equal to 1447.40 mm belonged to male crania (95% confidence). Values for this area that were less than or equal to 1260.36 mm belonged to female crania (95% confidence).
The risk for facial nerve injury has been reported to be increased with the inclusion of superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) elevation as compared with a skin-only face lift. The facial nerve courses through the parotid gland. The SMAS is elevated superficial to the parotid gland. However, in elevating the SMAS anterior to the parotid gland, the facial nerve is at risk of injury where its branches emerge from the anterior edge of the parotid gland. The purpose of this study was to identify bony anatomic landmarks to predict the location of the anterior edge of the parotid gland to avoid injury to the facial nerve branches as they exit the parotid gland. The authors dissected 20 cadaver face halves to determine bony landmarks-the masseteric tuberosity and the inferior lateral orbital rim-to predict the location of the anterior parotid edge. Then they measured the anterior edge of the parotid gland in relation to the vector formed between these two bony landmarks. They identified and measured the most anterior portion of the parotid gland in relation to this vector. Then the most posterior aspect of the parotid gland in relation to this vector was measured. In the 20 dissections, the authors found the most anterior portion of the parotid gland to be 2.7 +/- 1.0 mm anterior to the vector from the inferior lateral orbital rim to the masseteric tuberosity. The most posterior part of the anterior edge of the parotid gland in relation to this vector was found to be 1.0 +/- 1.5 mm posterior to this vector. The parotid gland measured an average of 38.8 +/- 3.5 mm in width from the tragus to the anterior parotid edge. In elevating the SMAS with a face lift, the facial nerve branches can be predicted to exit the anterior edge of the parotid gland, which can be located 38.8 mm anterior to the tragus and near the vector from the inferior lateral orbital wall to the masseteric tuberosity.