PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12375582

Integrating ethics and quality improvement: practical implementation in the transitional/ extended care setting.

Abstract

A major challenge in health care today is to provide high-quality care that results in the best outcomes possible for patients and residents within the limits of available resources. Throughout the past decade, there has been a call from ethicists for health care institutions to integrate the ethics and quality improvement processes. This article describes how a transitional/extended care facility integrated the quality improvement process within an ethical framework to achieve high-quality care while controlling cost.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mary Piette, Julie L Ellis, Phyllis St Denis, Jaclyn Sarauer. 2002. Integrating ethics and quality improvement: practical implementation in the transitional/ extended care setting.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001786-200210000-00005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Legal repercussions of Clinical Ethics Committees reports].

Clinical Ethics Committees and Research Ethics Committees have their own specific roles. The Clinical Ethics Committee's pronouncements have an advisory function, whereas Research Ethics Committees' decisions are binding. This article analyzes the legal impact of the Clinical Ethics Committees' reports. Legal and medical reasoning share the same practical nature. Both can have several correct answers to the same situation. Clinical Ethics Committees deliberate about these alternatives and analyze the involved values. Their conclusions are non-compulsory recommendations. They do not replace nor diminish the doctor's personal responsibility. Even though the Clinical Ethics Committees' reports are not binding, they constitute a sort of "expert's opinion", expressed by qualified professionals, who assume their own professional responsibility as advisors. The members' behavior is necessarily subject to constitutional and legal regulations. When judges review the Clinical Ethics Committee's reports, they must realize that their nature is advisory, and also consider them an essential element to reduce the gap between the medical and legal fields. In this way, the problem of increasingly transforming medicine into a legal issue can be prevented.

Ethics Committees, Clinical↗