PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12378400

Interventional management of aortic dissection.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern high-resolution imaging techniques have provided new insights into the pathogenesis of aortic dissection during recent years. Distinct pathologic entities or potential precursors of classic false-lumen aortic dissection such as intramural hematoma or penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer have been identified. As a result, a novel classification according to Svensson used in addition to the standard differentiation according to DeBakey or Stanford has been introduced. Due to improved diagnostic imaging, preoperative mortality has decreased but mortality remains substantial (up to 1.4% per hour within the first 2 days) related to complications of aortic dissection such as aortic rupture, bleeding, pericardial tamponade, critical branch vessel ischemia, multiorgan failure, and myocardial infarction. EXAMINATIONS: Transesophageal echocardiography, angiography, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography as well as intravascular ultrasound are used for a complete vascular "staging" of patients with aortic dissection after initial stabilization (with or without surgery). New catheter-based interventional techniques have been developed to improve the poor prognosis of aortic dissection: 1 Percutaneous balloon fenestration (PTF) of the intimal flap improves perfusion in case of bowel, limb, or renal ischemia. 2. Aortic stent-graft placement allows for occlusion of the intimal entry tear by implantation of a membrane-covered, self-expanding stent-graft to initiate progressive thrombus formation within the false lumen. Compared to the traditional surgical approaches, both techniques have a low complication rate. The development of these techniques may help to further improve to decrease patients' morbidity and mortality.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Holger Eggebrecht, Dietrich Baumgart, Ulf Herold, Jarowit Piotrowski, Jörg Barkhausen, Richard Wiesemes, Jürgen Peters, Stefan G Rühm, Heinz Jakob, Raimund Erbel. 2002. Interventional management of aortic dissection.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-002-2406-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Imaging of aortic abnormalities with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. A pictorial comparison with CT.

Aortic abnormalities are commonly encountered and may represent a diagnostic challenge in patients with acute or chronic clinical symptoms. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with low mechanical index (low MI) is a new promising method in the diagnosis and follow-up of pathological aortic lesions. CEUS with SonoVue allows a more rapid and noninvasive diagnosis, especially in critical patients because of its bedside availability. This review compares CEUS findings with those documented on computed tomography angiography (CTA), allowing the reader to appreciate the usefulness of CEUS in this clinical situation.

Aortic Dissection↗

Risk of local adverse events by gender following cardiac catheterization.

PURPOSE: To assess the reason for the relative high risk of local complications for women following cardiac catheterization by evaluating the associations between gender, sheath size, and local adverse outcomes following cardiac catheterization. METHODS: The data used in this study were obtained from a portion of the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR), which included 13 878 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization at one of 59 participating cardiac catheterization institutions throughout the United States during late 2003. Rates of serious local vascular adverse events were calculated by gender following cardiac catheterization, by type of vascular hemostasis used, stratified by arterial sheath size. RESULTS: Serious local vascular events were reported in 3.54% of patients, most commonly hematoma (2.00%). The relative risk for women of any vascular complication was 1.40 [95%CI = 1.17, 1.67, p = 0.0002]. A statistically significant relative risk for woman was evident when collagen plug devices or manual compression alone were used as the first method for hemostasis. The rate of vascular complications increased progressively with increasing sheath size, more so in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS: High relative risk for women of local vascular complications following cardiac catheterization was demonstrated with use of manual compression, as well as with collagen plug devices to control femoral artery bleeding. Large sheath size is associated with both a relatively high absolute risk and a high relative risk for women. Knowledge of this information should be considered by interventional cardiologists in making decisions on how to achieve hemostasis following cardiac catheterization.

Aortic Dissection↗