PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12389176

[Depression and epilepsy].

Abstract

AIMS: To review the literature on the frequency, aetiology, risk factors, diagnosis and treatment of depression in epileptic illness with a view to clarifying certain controversial issues in a clinically relevant subject. METHOD: Work published on this subject over the last three years was analysed and the data combined in order to achieve a scientific approach to the clinical handling of these patients. We analyse papers, especially reviews of literature on the subject, we compare postures and attempt to highlight the most popular. We point out the aspects that are still in need of study and the gaps to be filled in handling protocols, and we propose characteristics required for future research. CONCLUSIONS: Interictal depression is frequent, and appears in some moment in the evolution in one out of every three epileptics, especially in cases of severe epilepsy with frequent seizures. There are aetiological factors and risk indicators, both of a biological and a psychosocial nature, that point to a more likely appearance of depression. Treatment includes the control of epileptic seizures with a reappraisal of the established pharmacological antiepileptic treatment; the use of antidepressants is, however, nearly always necessary. Choice of the antidepressant must be based on knowledge of pharmacological interactions, the side effects, possible effects on the convulsion threshold and efficiency. Among all the antidepressants, the new ones, especially citalopram and some other SSRIs, seem to offer less convulsant risk and maprotiline, amoxapine and bupropion are clearly unadvisable. Electroconvulsive therapy can be a good therapeutic option.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Martínez-Pérez, E González-Goizueta, J A Mauri-Llerda. [Depression and epilepsy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12389176/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide (zonegran) in the treatment of essential tremor.

Medical therapy for essential tremor (ET), a common movement disorder, is often inadequate. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS), an antiepileptic agent, in treating ET. Twenty patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years) with ET were randomized to receive ZNS or placebo. ZNS was initiated at a dosage of 100 mg/day and escalated to 200 mg/day at day 14. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale at baseline and days 14 and 28, as well as the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-C) scale at day 28. At endpoint, subjects assigned to ZNS were taking a mean dosage of 160 +/- 50 mg/day. There were no significant improvements in the FTM total score or its subsections. Tremor amplitude as assessed by accelerometry significantly improved in the ZNS group compared to the placebo group at endpoint relative to baseline (-0.50 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.79 m/s(2); P = 0.03). On the CGI-C, 60% (n = 6) of patients in the ZNS group felt that their tremor was unchanged, while the remaining patients felt that their tremor was "minimally improved." Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients taking ZNS discontinued the study due to side effects (fatigue, headache, paresthesias) while taking 100 mg per day. ZNS did not provide significant improvements in clinical rating scales at study endpoint compared to placebo and was only modestly well tolerated. ZNS was effective in reducing tremor amplitude as measured by accelerometry.

Anticonvulsants↗