PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12395593

[Gene-expression analysis using DNA microarrays].

Abstract

Parallel to the efforts to unravel the human genome code, techniques are currently being developed to analyse the activity of all genes and proteins in a cell population or tissue. The most advanced of these functional genomic techniques is that used to study gene expression using DNA microarrays, also known as 'DNA chips'. This allows the expression of thousands of different genes to be compared in two different samples (for example, one from a sick person and one from a healthy one). Bioinformatics is essential in this technique. The expression profiles obtained in this way can be used to characterise complex biological situations (e.g., cell division and apoptosis) and diseases. There have already been reports on the opportunities in the diagnostic work-up for leukaemias and breast cancer. There are also applications on the more basic level, such as discovering precisely how the transcription apparatus works, and finding new genes and identifying their role. The use of microarrays in medicine is still in its infancy. It is anticipated that this and similar genome-wide analysis techniques will help in the elucidation of pathophysiological mechanisms, in making diagnoses and prognoses, and in monitoring treatment. The justifiable enthusiasm should, however, be accompanied by quality control, international standardisation and a critical approach towards the interpretation of results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G B Braam, H A R Bluyssen, E E Voest, H A Koomans. 2002-10-05. [Gene-expression analysis using DNA microarrays].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12395593/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Tracking the uptake of evidence: two decades of hospital practice trends for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Advances in clinical research methods have led to prospective randomized controlled (level 1) clinical studies evaluating diagnostic modalities resulting in a paradigm shift in the literature for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). To assess whether these advances correlate with clinical practice, we analyzed 21-year trends in diagnostic testing for patients with venous thromboembolism. METHODS: We used discharge data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey (1979-1999) to determine DVT and PE cases annually. Procedure fields were screened to determine patients who had DVT or PE or who underwent venography, arteriography of the pulmonary arteries, pulmonary scintigraphy, or DVT ultrasonic scanning. Searching EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the American Thoracic Society guidelines, a literature-based time line of level 1 studies was derived and juxtaposed against trends and procedure use. RESULTS: Improved diagnostic tests resulted in diagnostic changes in patients with suspected venous thromboembolism. These observed changes correlated over time in subsequent years with level 1 studies. Diagnostic DVT approaches showed an initial marked increased use of venography followed by a rapid decline that coincided with increased use of Doppler ultrasonography. Diagnostic approaches to PE were characterized by initial marked increases in lung scanning followed by a rapid decline as use of ultrasonography considerably increased and pulmonary angiography modestly increased. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic approaches to DVT and PE have changed markedly during the past 2 decades, in temporal harmony with the evolving literature. Change in clinical practice occurs over years, and long-term follow-up is required to capture this change.

Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures↗