PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12395957

Evolving dissatisfaction among primary care physicians.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in career satisfaction among physicians working with managed care plans. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional surveys conducted in 1996 and 1999. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We surveyed primary care physicians (PCPs) affiliated with 5 large health plans in Massachusetts and assessed physicians' ratings of overall satisfaction with their current practice situation and with managed care. RESULTS: A total of 1336 PCPs (56%) responded to the 1996 survey and 966 (42%) responded to the 1999 survey. In 1996, 19.8% of physicians were somewhat or very dissatisfied with their current practice situation vs 33.4% in 1999, an increase of more than 50% (P < .001). Overall dissatisfaction with managed care increased from 28.3% to 62.2% (P < .001). In multivariable models, external influences on physicians' practices were important predictors of overall dissatisfaction. Physicians whose choice of hospitals was restricted (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.78) and those who reported that managed care plans influenced their practice "a lot" (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.11) were more likely to be dissatisfied. Adequacy of reimbursement was an important predictor of overall satisfaction and satisfaction with managed care, and ways physicians experienced financial incentives were associated with managed care dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians in Massachusetts are increasingly dissatisfied with their practice and with managed care. Continued erosion of physician satisfaction could have significant implications for quality of care and the quality of the workforce attracted to medicine as a career.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bruce E Landon, Robert Aseltine, James A Shaul, Yael Miller, Bruce A Auerbach, Paul D Cleary. 2002. Evolving dissatisfaction among primary care physicians.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12395957/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗