PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12400183

Confusion: an ambiguous term in A&E practice.

K Davies·S Jones
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The term 'confusion' can create conflicting images in terms of a patient's level of consciousness, awareness and ability to communicate effectively. In relation to Accident and Emergency (A&E) practice it is crucial that the nurse assessing the patient is not only taking into account the presenting clinical picture, but is also cognisant of the potential cumulative effects of physiological, psychological, pharmacological, sociological and environmental factors. Clearly, the assessment process should take these factors and the possible effects of the patient's journey to the A&E department into account when forming an opinion in respect of levels of consciousness. This paper will explore a number of potential co-factors, factors that could influence the patient's presentation and create an ambiguous misleading and conflicting picture unless all co-factors are considered.

Explore related subjects

ConfusionEmergency Service, HospitalHumansNursing AssessmentRisk FactorsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Davies, S Jones. 2002. Confusion: an ambiguous term in A&E practice.. https://doi.org/10.1054/aaen.2001.0337

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Disorientation inhibits landmark use in 12-18-month-old infants.

Recent research has indicated that, particularly under conditions of inertial disorientation, mammals may be sensitive to landmark configuration geometry at the expense of individual featural information when locating hidden goals. The current study sought to establish whether landmark use could be demonstrated in 12-18-month-old infants with and without a disorientation procedure, and with geometrically ambiguous landmark configurations. A peekaboo paradigm was employed in which infants learned to anticipate a peekaboo event after a cue from two locations within a circular arena, followed by a test trial from a novel position in which no peekaboo occurred after the cue. In all conditions, an isosceles triangle arrangement of landmarks was used, with peekaboo occurring between the landmarks of one of the two equal "sides", thus being geometrically ambiguous. In two conditions, the landmarks were distinctive, and in two further conditions, they were identical. In one of the distinctive conditions and one of the identical landmark conditions, infants underwent a disorientation procedure in between training and test trials. Only oriented infants with distinctive landmarks were successful in test trials, thus suggesting that infants are able to use the individual features of landmarks to locate a goal, but can only do so if oriented.

Confusion↗
PubMed2006

Mugshot exposure effects: Retroactive interference, mugshot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious transference.

More than 25 years of research has accumulated concerning the possible biasing effects of mugshot exposure to eyewitnesses. Two separate metaanalyses were conducted on 32 independent tests of the hypothesis that prior mugshot exposure decreases witness accuracy at a subsequent lineup. Mugshot exposure both significantly decreased proportion correct and increased the false alarm rate, the effect being greater on false alarms. A mugshot commitment effect, arising from the identification of someone in a mugshot, was a substantial moderator of both these effects. Simple retroactive interference, where the target person is not included among mugshots and no one in a mugshot is present in the subsequent lineup, did not significantly impair target identification. A third metaanalysis was conducted on 19 independent tests of the hypothesis that failure of memory for facial source or context results in transference errors. The effect size was more than twice as large for "transference" studies involving mugshot exposure in proximate temporal context with the target than for "bystander" studies with no subsequent mugshot exposure.

Confusion↗