PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12403221

Pulmonary function in infants exposed to pethidine.

Thrathip Kolatat·Supattra Jarungphan·Chantima Charastong·Yupin Jundeewong
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of maternal pethidine administration on pulmonary function tests in newborn infants. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital. The study group consisted of 20 infants exposed to pethidine within 4 hours prior to delivery. Twenty infants whose mothers received no analgesic drug or regional anesthesia were randomly selected as the controls. Narcotic related respiratory depression was determined by Apgar scores, the need for ventilatory support in the delivery room and abnormal pulmonary function measurements. RESULTS: There was no difference in birth weight and gestational age between the two groups of infants. Pethidine was given to mothers at a dose of 72.5 +/- 7.6 mg/kg with a mean drug-delivery interval of 152 +/- 61 minutes. One infant in each group had a 1-minute Apgar score less than 7, but there was no statistical difference in the mean Apgar score between the two groups. None of the infants whose mothers received pethidine required ventilatory support, but oxygen was provided to eight infants who were apparently cyanosed at birth. Pulmonary function measurements were performed at the age of 7.4 +/- 2.3 hours in the controls and 6.0 +/- 2.5 hours in the study group. There was no significant difference in respiratory rate, tidal volume, inspiratory time, functional residual capacity, compliance and resistance between the two groups of infants. CONCLUSION: Severe narcotic related respiratory depression was uncommon in this study. In the first 12 hours of life, there was no significant difference in pulmonary function of the infants exposed to pethidine. It is quite safe to allow the baby to room-in with the mother if respiratory depression is not presented at birth.

Explore related subjects

Analgesics, OpioidApgar ScoreBirth WeightCase-Control StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMaternal ExposureMeperidinePregnancyProbabilityProspective StudiesReference ValuesRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornRespiratory Function TestsRespiratory Physiological PhenomenaRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thrathip Kolatat, Supattra Jarungphan, Chantima Charastong, Yupin Jundeewong. 2002. Pulmonary function in infants exposed to pethidine.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12403221/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Sex differences in the potency of kappa opioids and mixed-action opioids administered systemically and at the site of inflammation against capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia in rats.

RATIONALE: Sex differences in the potency of the antinociceptive effects of kappa opioids have been reported in various acute pain models with evidence suggesting that these sex differences are mediated by activity in the N-methyl-D: -aspartate (NMDA) system. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate sex differences in the antihyperalgesic actions of selected kappa and mixed-action opioids in a persistent pain model and determine if the NMDA system modulates these effects in a sexually dimorphic manner. METHODS: Using gonadally intact male and female F344 rats, hyperalgesia was induced by local administration of capsaicin in the tail, after which the tail was immersed in a mildly noxious thermal stimulus (45 degrees C water), and tail-withdrawal latency measured. Opioids were then administered systemically (s.c.) and locally (in the tail) alone, and in selected combinations with the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist dextromethorphan. RESULTS: When administered systemically and locally, the kappa opioids spiradoline, U69,593 and U50,488, and the mixed-action opioids butorphanol and nalbuphine, produced dose-dependent antihyperalgesic effects. Whereas the kappa opioids were generally more potent in males, sex differences were not observed with the mixed-action opioids. Peripheral receptor activity was confirmed for local administration of kappa opioids by the antagonism observed after local, but not intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.), administration of the kappa antagonist nor-binaltorphamine (nor-BNI). Dextromethorphan was equally potent in attenuating the antihyperalgesia induced by kappa opioids in both males and females. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate sex differences in kappa opioid activity in a persistent pain model. Although an NMDA antagonist blocked the effects of kappa opioids in this model, these effects were not sexually dimorphic as reported in most acute pain models.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2007

Systematic review: opioid treatment for chronic back pain: prevalence, efficacy, and association with addiction.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence, efficacy, and risk for addiction for persons receiving opioids for chronic back pain are unclear. PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of opioid treatment, whether opioid medications are effective, and the prevalence of substance use disorders among patients receiving opioid medications for chronic back pain. DATA SOURCES: English-language studies from MEDLINE (1966-March 2005), EMBASE (1966-March 2005), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (to 4th quarter 2004), PsychInfo (1966-March 2005), and retrieved references. STUDY SELECTION: Articles that studied an adult, nonobstetric sample; used oral, topical, or transdermal opioids; and focused on treatment for chronic back pain. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators independently extracted data and determined study quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Opioid prescribing varied by treatment setting (range, 3% to 66%). Meta-analysis of the 4 studies assessing the efficacy of opioids compared with placebo or a nonopioid control did not show reduced pain with opioids (g, -0.199 composite standardized mean difference [95% CI, -0.49 to 0.11]; P = 0.136). Meta-analysis of the 5 studies directly comparing the efficacy of different opioids demonstrated a nonsignificant reduction in pain from baseline (g, -0.93 composite standardized mean difference [CI, -1.89 to -0.03]; P = 0.055). The prevalence of lifetime substance use disorders ranged from 36% to 56%, and the estimates of the prevalence of current substance use disorders were as high as 43%. Aberrant medication-taking behaviors ranged from 5% to 24%. LIMITATIONS: Retrieval and publication biases and poor study quality. No trial evaluating the efficacy of opioids was longer than 16 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids are commonly prescribed for chronic back pain and may be efficacious for short-term pain relief. Long-term efficacy (> or =16 weeks) is unclear. Substance use disorders are common in patients taking opioids for back pain, and aberrant medication-taking behaviors occur in up to 24% of cases.

Analgesics, Opioid↗