PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12409880

Gene therapy for erectile dysfunction: where is it going?

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will summarize the most recent preclinical data from the leading US laboratories regarding the application of gene therapy to the treatment of erectile dysfunction. The implications of these findings in the field of gene therapy in general, and more specifically to the treatment of non-life threatening disorders such as erectile dysfunction, will be outlined. RECENT FINDINGS: The preclinical work of several laboratories has clearly documented 'proof-of-concept' for the utility of gene therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. A variety of vectors and several distinct molecular targets have been successfully leveraged. Such observations suggest that numerous potential strategies may exist for gene-based treatments of erectile dysfunction. SUMMARY: The apparent preclinical success of most, if not all, gene-based strategies for the treatment of erectile dysfunction is consistent with the multifactorial regulatory mechanisms governing the erectile process. The bottleneck in the gene therapy clinical development process therefore apparently will not lie in the ability to identify relevant molecular targets that are amenable to gene therapy for erectile dysfunction, but rather in the safety, specificity and longevity of those targets. That is, the next technical hurdle is to find the strategy(ies) that has the best safety profile, the greatest specificity for altering (increasing) intracavernous pressure 'on demand' and, furthermore, the most appropriate (longest?) half-life. While these criteria may correspond to intuition, finding molecular targets that clear these clinical hurdles may place restrictions on the molecular choices for gene transfer.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

George J Christ. 2002. Gene therapy for erectile dysfunction: where is it going?. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042307-200211000-00010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Short history of erectile dysfunction treatment].

Since the origin, the man tried by all possible means to restor his erectile capacity. The obscurantism prevailed for a long time. We had to wait up to the turn of the 19th Century with Freud to get that things evolve a little bit. In the Fifties, the first penile prostheses were developed by Goodwin and Scott. In the Sixties, the behavioral therapies by Masters and Johnson. The Eighties represent the pharmacological revolution with the discovery of the effects of papaverin by Virag, then the E1 prostaglandin by Ishii, as well as the inhibitors of the 5 phospho di esterase (sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil) following studies on nitric oxide by Ignarro, Nobel Prize of medicine in 1998.

Erectile Dysfunction↗

Self-reported volume of radical prostatectomies among urologists in the USA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the variability in the volume of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) performed by urologists in the USA, and the physician characteristics that predict RP volume, as previous studies showed that individual surgeon volume for RP is associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS: In a nationwide, representative survey of 2000 urologists who treat prostate carcinoma in the USA, we asked respondents to indicate a numerical range of RPs they perform each year (none, 1-10, 11-30, and >30, the last which we defined as 'high volume'). We then identified characteristics of the provider and practice associated with a high volume of RPs. Supplementing survey results with other national data, we estimated the proportion of all RPs in the USA performed by 'high-volume' urologists. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 66.1% (1313 urologists) with no differences between the respondents and non-respondents for the measured demographic variables. Among urologists who performed RPs (89.1% of the sample), 37.3% did < or = 10, 46.9% 11-30 and 15.8% >30 RPs/year. Academic and urological oncology fellowship-trained urologists were, respectively, 41% and 27% more likely than private-practice and non-fellowship-trained urologists to have a high volume of RPs. Of all RPs performed yearly in the USA, only an estimated 46.1% were by high-volume urologists. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of urologists report a RP volume that might be associated with higher rates of cardiac, respiratory, vascular, wound-healing, and genitourinary complications. Further study is needed to characterize the possible relationships between RP volume and tumour recurrence, survival, and long-term erectile dysfunction and incontinence.

Erectile Dysfunction↗