PubMed · 12413033
A simple method for visualizing the differences between related receptor sites.
Abstract
Pastor and Cruciani [J. Med. Chem. 38 (1995) 4637] and Kastenholz et al. [J. Med. Chem. 43 (2000) 3033] pioneered methods for comparing related receptors, with the ultimate goal of designing selective ligands. Such methods start with a reasonable superposition of high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) structures of the receptors. Next, molecular field maps are calculated for each receptor. Then the maps are analyzed to determine which map features are correlated with a particular subset of receptors. We present a method FLOGTV, based on the trend vector paradigm [J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 25 (1985) 64] to perform the analysis. This is mathematically simpler than the GRID/CPCA method of Kastenholz et al. and allows for the simultaneous comparison of many receptor structures. Also, the trend vector paradigm provides a method of selecting isopotential contours that are well above "noise". We demonstrate the method on four examples: HIV proteases versus two-domain acid proteases, thrombin versus trypsin and factor Xa, bacterial dihydrofolate reductases (DHFRs) versus vertebrate DHFRs, and P38 versus ERK protein kinases.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Robert P Sheridan, M Katharine Holloway, Georgia McGaughey, Ralph T Mosley, Suresh B Singh. 2002. A simple method for visualizing the differences between related receptor sites.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1093-3263(02)00122-5
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.