PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12415842

[Laparoscopic biliary surgery].

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the standard treatment for patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease. However, there is a substantial proportion of patients in whom laparoscopic cholecystectomy cannot be successfully performed, and conversion to open surgery is required because of technical difficulties or complications. The incidence of bile duct injury has increased in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Meticulous dissection and intraoperative cholangiography could significantly reduce the rate of that injury. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is still controversial because of surgical difficulty. In our experience, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a beneficial option for patients with acute cholecystitis, and it may even be safe in the acute stage. A better alternative for high-risk early operation and septic cases is percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage. The coexistence of gallbladder cancer should be ruled out and preoperative diagnosis should be done carefully. Laparoscopic management of common bile duct (CBD) stones has many advantages. However it has been reported to be demanding and time-consuming to perform, which limits its widespread adoption. In our experience with 258 patients, laparoscopic CBD exploration was feasible for almost all CBD stones. The technical difficulties associated with laparoscopic CBD exploration could be overcome with the development of suitable equipment and increased expertise.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hiromi Tokumura, Toshiki Rikiyama, Nobuhiko Harada, Masayuki Kakyo, Kuniharu Yamamoto. 2002. [Laparoscopic biliary surgery].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12415842/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Itemized bill: novel method to audit the process of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

One of the recurring obstacles to the successful completion of a medical audit cycle is the unavailability of accurate and complete information. This is particularly evident in the review of clinical processes, where the hand-written medical record is the source of information. We have attempted to bypass this information deficit by using information recorded primarily for financial transactions, using the itemized bill. The study was conducted in two parts. Initially information recorded as an itemized bill for the in-hospital process of laparoscopic cholecystectomies over a one-year period was analyzed. Areas for change in practice were identified, and recommendations were developed. These recommendations were presented to a multidisciplinary group consisting of consultants, residents, and nursing staff involved in caring for these patients. A clinical pathway was developed and implemented from these recommendations. One year after introduction, a review of the clinical pathway was undertaken using the same methodology. The in-hospital process consisted of 23 charge categories according to the itemized bill. Of these, 8 accounted for 95% of the total charge. The surgeon's fee and the anesthesiologist's fee accounted for 34% of the total; medical/surgical supplies, 20%; operating theater time, 17%; pharmacy, 7%; radiology, 5%; laboratory, 7%; and ward, 4%. Areas were identified in the latter 6 categories for change. Review of practice 1 year after implementation of the changes showed that a large number of recommendations were in place. We describe a new method for auditing the processes of medical care, using the itemized bill to adapt and use information primarily recorded for financial purposes.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗