PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12418300

[Non-complicated and complicated polyfascicular blocks].

Abstract

Septal necrosis + Peripheral blocks. Because of an extensive septal necrosis, the manifestation of the initial ventricular activation forces decreases in the precordial leads. With left bifascicular block, first ventricular activation forces become evident, and the electrical signs of a sepatal necrosis are concealed. In the presence of a trifascicular block, the manifestation of the first ventricular electromotive forces diminishes again and the electrical signs of septal necrosis become evident once more. Small Q waves are present in leads V1 to V4. Extensive anterior necrosis + Peripheral blocks. Such a necrosis is manifested by QS complexes from V2 to V6. An associated left bifascicular block reduces the electrical manifestation of dead tissue: QS complexes persist only in V3 and V4. A trifascicular block determines the presence of QS complexes from V2 to V5. Posteroinferior necrosis + Peripheral blocks. Electromotive forces of the ventricular activation shift upward, due to a posteroinferior necrosis. QS or QR complexes are recorded in leads a VF, II, and III. A left bifascicular block displaces the main electromotive forces downward, posteriorly and to the left, due to a delay of the posteroinferior activation. QRS complexes become positive and wider in all leads, the reflect the potential variations of the inferior portions of the left ventricle: aVF, II, and III, sometimes V5 and V6. The electrical signs of necrosis are reduced or abolished. With a trifascicular block, wide and slurred QS complexes appear in aVF, II, III, and sometimes in V5 and V6 too.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alfredo de Micheli, Gustavo A Medrano, Alberto Aranda. [Non-complicated and complicated polyfascicular blocks].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12418300/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evidence of left ventricular contractile asynchrony by echocardiographic phase imaging in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and without clinically evident heart disease.

Left ventricular electromechanical asynchrony has been shown to predict cardiac events in patients with heart failure. This study investigated whether left ventricular asynchrony is present in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with no clinically evident heart disease and normal QRS durations. Asynchrony was evaluated in 24 patients with DM, 15 nondiabetic control subjects, and 20 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) due to cardiomyopathy serving as positive controls by conventional tissue Doppler imaging and by a novel method, echocardiographic phase imaging. Asynchrony was significantly higher in patients with DM than in controls and significantly lower than in patients with LBBB. This was shown by tissue Doppler imaging: the SD of time to peak myocardial velocity was 13 +/- 10 ms in controls, compared with 30 +/- 19 ms in patients with DM (p <0.01) and 68 +/- 28 ms in those with LBBB (p <0.001). Similar data were obtained using echocardiographic phase imaging: the SD of phase degrees was 25 degrees +/- 8 degrees in controls, compared with 44 degrees +/- 21 degrees in patients with DM (p = 0.02) and 76 degrees +/- 25 degrees in those with LBBB (p <0.001). Tissue Doppler imaging correlated with echocardiographic phase imaging (r = 0.79, p <0.0001) but was more time consuming (15.5 +/- 4.5 vs 4.5 +/- 2.2 min/patient, p <0.05) and showed higher intraobserver variability (5.6% vs 3.2%, p <0.05). In conclusion, this is the first study showing increased left ventricular asynchrony in patients with DM and no clinical evidence of heart disease.

Bundle-Branch Block↗

Short-term effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischaemic or nonischaemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure were candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) regardless of underlying aetiology. This study observed the effect of CRT in patients with ischaemic or nonischaemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: One hundred and forty-two patients with refractory chronic heart failure and left bundle branch block received cardiac resynchronization therapy, 91 men and 51 women, average age 60 years. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was severely depressed (mean 29%), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) enlarged (mean 72 mm) and QRS width was lengthened (mean 147 ms). Ninety-eight had nonischaemic cardiomyopathy and 44 had ischaemic cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: After cardiac resynchronization therapy, the heart function was significantly improved. The mean LVEF increased from 29% to 36% after pacing. In patients with nonischaemic cardiomyopathy, the LVEF was improved from 28% to 37%, and in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, the LVEF was improved from 30% to 36%. No significant difference of the improvement was found between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy could significantly improve cardiac function in patients with chronic heart failure regardless of the underlying heart disease.

Bundle-Branch Block↗