PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12436830

Effective topical anesthetic agents and techniques.

Abstract

What conclusions can be drawn concerning intraoral topical anesthesia? First, a variety of agents have been shown to have a pharmacologic effect. When used as a single agent, lidocaine is effective at concentrations between 5% and 20%. There is evidence of a dose response with lidocaine [17]. The combination of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine has been shown to be a reliable agent; however, at the time of writing, this mixture is not licensed for intraoral use. Benzocaine is effective when used alone at a concentration of 20% and when combined at a dose of 15% with 1.7% amethocaine. Second, a crucial factor governing effectiveness is the time of application. One study cited in this paper [23] has shown an effect occurring in the maxillary buccal sulcus after a 1-minute application. Others [17,25] have shown that a 2- to 3-minute application at the same site is no better than placebo. The differences in these studies may be caused by the use of different test stimuli, such as the gauge of the needle used and the depth of insertion. When applied for 5 minutes, it seems that success is guaranteed when used in the buccal fold of either jaw. Finally, the site of application is important. Palatal mucosa is more resistant to the effects of topical anesthetics than other intraoral sites investigated. There is no evidence that topical anesthetics have any value in reducing the discomfort of deep regional block administrations such as inferior alveolar nerve block injections.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

John G Meechan. 2002. Effective topical anesthetic agents and techniques.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-8532(02)00035-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Ultrasonic bone cutting for surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) under local anaesthesia.

Ultrasonic bone-cutting surgery has been recently introduced as a feasible alternative to the conventional tools of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, due to its technical characteristics of precision and safety. The device used is unique in that the cutting action occurs when the tool is employed on mineralized tissues, but stops on soft tissues. This technical note illustrates the use of Piezosurgery for all osteotomies of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME). The procedure, including pterygo-maxillary detachment, can be completed under local anaesthesia. Other advantages include minimal risk of jeopardizing critical anatomic structures (e.g. palatine artery), minimal intraoperative bleeding and postoperative swelling, and minimal thermal damage to bone surfaces. Narrow and rectilinear osteotomies can be easily performed with varying vibrating scalpels, at the cost of a longer operative time.

Anesthesia, Dental↗

Failure of locoregional anesthesia in dental practice. Review of the literature.

Correct identification of the causes of dental anesthetic failure is essential in order to adopt the required measures for successful anesthesia. A review is made of the factors implicated in locoregional anesthesia failure, such as a bifid inferior alveolar nerve, retromolar foramen associated to accessory innervation, double or accessory mental foramen, the relation between the infiltration technique and bone density, accessory innervation in the case of the mylohyoid nerve and first cervical branches, cross innervation of the incisors, inactivity in the presence of tissue inflammation, inactive anesthetic solutions, an incorrect technique, and subjective perception on the part of particularly anxious patients. The therapeutic options available in the event such problems are encountered in routine clinical practice are commented.

Anesthesia, Dental↗