PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12441888

Safety considerations for statins.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors or statins offer important benefits for the large populations of individuals at high risk for coronary heart disease. These drugs have a good safety profile. Nevertheless, differences in physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties between statins may translate into significant differences in long-term safety. This review focuses on long-term adverse effects related to statin use, namely hepatotoxicity and myopathy. Moreover, the most common drugs used in combination with statins in long-term therapies are analyzed in terms of possible drug/drug interactions affecting the safety of statins. RECENT FINDINGS: The withdrawal of cerivastatin from the global market in 2001, because of severe cases of rhabdomyolysis, highlighted concerns regarding the safety of the entire class. Afterwards, the role of statins and their interactions with other drugs in precipitating this condition have been carefully reviewed. In approximately 60% of the total number of cases, statin-related rhabdomyolysis was found to be related to drug/drug interactions. Recently, all cases of fatal rhabdomyolysis associated with statin use have been reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. This has shown that fatal rhabdomyolysis among statin users is a rare event, the reporting rates being much less than one death per million prescriptions in the case of all statins except cerivastatin. SUMMARY: The safety and tolerability of the available statins support their use as the first-line treatment of patients at high risk for coronary heart disease, since the clinical benefits greatly outweigh the small risk of myopathy. Nevertheless, clinicians should be aware of the adverse effects possibly related to statin therapy, particularly in patients at high risk for coronary heart disease and requiring long-term multiple-drug therapies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chiara Bolego, Roberta Baetta, Stefano Bellosta, Alberto Corsini, Rodolfo Paoletti. 2002. Safety considerations for statins.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00041433-200212000-00007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering--morning versus evening statin administration.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the best time to administer statins for optimal lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by reviewing the clinical evidence evaluating the chronobiologic effects of morning versus evening statin administration. DATA SOURCES: Using the MeSH terms HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, statins, morning and evening dosing, and clinical trials, a literature review was conducted to identify articles in MEDLINE (1966-December 2006), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-December 2006), and IOWA Drug Information Systems (1985-December 2006). DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven English-language studies evaluating morning and evening statin administration were identified and evaluated. Based on the available data, simvastatin demonstrated a pronounced LDL-C percentage reduction with evening dosing. Although not statistically significant, a trend in the LDL-C percentage reduction favoring evening statin administration was noted with lovastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin. Atorvastatin demonstrated similar LDL-C reduction regardless of administration time. With the exception of simvastatin, the trials comparing morning versus evening effects of statins on LDL-C have several significant methodologic shortcomings, including small sample size, lack of statistical power, and inappropriate exclusion criteria that did not include or did not mention drug-induced effects on lipids. CONCLUSIONS: There are sufficient data to support evening administration of simvastatin to achieve optimal lowering of LDL-C levels. Rigorous and robust trials are necessary to determine the best administration time to achieve optimal LDL-C lowering for lovastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and fluvastatin.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

Will torcetrapib be the next big thing in coronary heart disease risk reduction?

Scientists are seeking ways to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol to lower coronary heart disease (CHD). Emerging from this search is torcetrapib, a partial inhibitor of cholesteryl ester transfer protein. Via this mechanism, cholesteryl ester is prevented from being transferred to apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins and is retained in HDL particles, where ostensibly it may be delivered directly to the liver for elimination. Proof that this may reduce atherosclerotic vascular disease is provided by population studies of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) deficiencies and single nucleotide polymorphisms of CETP, and experiments in animal models treated with torcetrapib. Torcetrapib effectively raises HDL cholesterol when used alone and when added to background therapy with atorvastatin. The drug appears to be well tolerated. Large surrogate and survival outcome trials are underway to document its impact on CHD.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗