Non-visual information does not drive saccade gain adaptation in monkeys.

Abstract

Recent experiments have characterized the dependence of saccade gain adaptation on the characteristics of the visual error following inaccurate saccades. We currently know little about the potential role of non-visual information in driving saccade adaptation. The brain could use non-visual signals from the saccade burst generator or extraocular muscle (EOM) proprioceptors to determine if the eye had rotated the appropriate distance to aim at a target. Both saccade-related burst signals and EOM proprioceptive information reach the posterior vermis of the cerebellum, a brain area strongly implicated in saccade adaptation. In the experiment described here we determined if non-visual information has a significant affect on saccade adaptation. We made monkey saccades hypometric with intra-saccade target movements and then tested the recovery of saccade gain toward normal under three conditions: (1) when the target was continuously visible, (2) when the target extinguished for 1000 ms beginning during the saccade, and (3) when the monkey remained in the dark. In the first condition both visual and non-visual indications of hypometria were available. In the second, only non-visual information was available. In the third, the monkey made no visually guided saccades and very few spontaneous saccades in the dark so neither visual nor non-visual information could drive adaptation. We found that, though it was hypometric, saccade size during recovery changed the same small amount when monkeys made saccades to extinguishing targets or remained in the dark. Saccade size changed significantly (approximately 5x) more during recovery when the monkey tracked continuously visible targets. Thus non-visual information has no influence on adaptation and visual post-saccade error is the only known driver of saccade adaptation.