PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12462540

Augmented-view for restricted visual field: multiple device implementations.

Fernando Vargas-Martín·Eli Peli
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE: An augmented-view device for patients with severely restricted peripheral visual fields (tunnel vision) was proposed, combining a see-through head-mounted display and a simultaneous minified view of a wide field presented as contour information. Here we create and evaluate multiple implementations of the augmented-view concept and report responses from potential users. METHODS: Several prototypes using commercial off-the-shelf devices were implemented. Then they were evaluated in real environments in daylight and at night by two retinitis pigmentosa patients. RESULTS: Effective expansion of the visual field of patients was achieved. Patients indicated their preferences for different properties, devices, and combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Patients found the augmented-view concept of help for their impairment, but wanted much more ergonomic design than the prototypes provided. Benefits, limitations, and possible improvements for the evaluated devices are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Equipment DesignEquipment and SuppliesHumansPhotographyRetinitis PigmentosaVision DisordersVisual FieldsJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fernando Vargas-Martín, Eli Peli. 2002. Augmented-view for restricted visual field: multiple device implementations.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200211000-00009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Microchip PCR.

Miniaturization of genetic tests has become an important goal. This review surveys the current progress towards the miniaturization of tests based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). It examines the different types of PCR microchip designs, fabrication methods,and the components of a microchip PCR device. It also discusses the problems attributable to surface chemistry of microchip components (inhibition of PCR), and the static and dynamic surface passivation strategies developed for the solution of these difficulties

Equipment Design↗
PubMed2003

Fluid leakage past tracheal tube cuffs: evaluation of the new Microcuff endotracheal tube.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the recently introduced Microcuff endotracheal tube HVLP ICU featuring an ultrathin (7-microm) polyurethane cuff membrane with endotracheal tubes from different manufacturers regarding fluid leakage past the tube cuff. DESIGN: In vitro setup. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The following endotracheal tubes (ID 7.5 mm) were compared: Mallinckrodt HiLo, Microcuff HVLP ICU, Portex Profile Soft Seal, Rüsch Super Safety Clear, and Sheridan CF. A vertical PVC trachea model (ID 20 mm) was intubated, and cuffs were inflated to 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 60 cmH2O. Colored water (5 ml) was added to the top of the cuff. The amount of leaked fluid past the tube cuff within 5, 10, and 60 min was recorded. Experiments were performed four times using two examples of each tube brand. Fluid leakage past tube cuffs occurred in all conventional endotracheal tubes at cuff pressures from 10 to 60 cmH2O. In the Microcuff tube cuff pressure fluid leakage was observed within 10 min only at 10 cmH2O. Results with the Microcuff tube were significantly better than all other tube brands at cuff pressures of 10-30 cmH2O. CONCLUSIONS: Within the acceptable upper limit for tracheal cuff pressure (25-30 cmH2O) the Microcuff endotracheal tube was the only one of the tested tubes to prevent fluid leakage in our in vitro setup. In vivo studies are required to confirm these findings.

Equipment Design↗