PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12463277

Zolmitriptan: differences from sumatriptan.

Abstract

Zolmitriptan is a potent 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist whose targets include the peripheral and central components of the trigeminovascular system. It is generally well-tolerated and has dose-dependent efficacy in the treatment of migraine. The 2.5 mg dose is felt to provide the best balance between efficacy and adverse events. In a direct comparative study, the 2 h headache response rate for zolmitriptan 2.5 mg was statistically superior to sumatriptan 25 and 50 mg, although at 3.3% not clinically significant. Two comparative studies have found no difference in adverse event frequency between zolmitriptan and sumatriptan.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P J Goadsby, C J Boes. 2001. Zolmitriptan: differences from sumatriptan.. https://doi.org/10.1185/0300799039117013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Determining the diagnosis from the pain pattern. Brief and stabbing or chronic and dull?].

For the neurological differential diagnosis of facial pain, symptomatic pain must be differentiated from the so-called primary pain syndromes. Trigeminal neuralgia is usually readily diagnosed on the basis of the typical history. The treatment of choice is carbamazepine. If this fails, invasive options are available. Atypical facial pain should be diagnosed only when all known primary and secondary pain syndromes have been excluded. Treatment is difficult and comprises the administration of tricyclic antidepressants. Cluster headache and chronic paroxysmal hemicrania each has an unmistakable temporal course. Although the etiology remains unknown, specific therapeutic options are available. The Tolosa-Hunt syndrome is presumably caused by a granuloma in the cavernous sinus, and treatment is effected with corticosteroids. Painful craniomandibular dysfunction (CMD) is often misinterpreted as atypical facial pain.

Cluster Headache↗

Psychological and emotional aspects and pain.

A patient's psychological condition can be influenced by symptoms and, at the same time, it can influence the perception of symptoms. In psychological assessment, pain can modify the results of a questionnaire, so a patient's state at the moment of the evaluation should be taken into account. Questionnaires used in assessment do not always provide clear-cut answers concerning the individual psychological component. Moreover, difficulties in classifying headache patients does not permit correct comparisons between population samples whenever patients are not classified into well defined homogeneous groups. Overall, in the three groups examined - migraine, tension-type headache and cluster headache - it can be affirmed that with self-report assessment based on questionnaires, the tension-type headache subjects present a more interesting psychological profile for its clinical implications.

Cluster Headache↗

Epidemiology of cluster headache.

Cluster headache is rare, occurring in less than 1% of the population. Studies suggest that, in addition to the pain and associated autonomic disturbances recognized to be characteristic of the syndrome, patients also may experience nausea, photophobia, behavioral agitation, or restlessness. A decreasing male:female ratio also has been noted, perhaps attributable to lifestyle trends adopted by more women that were previously associated with men, such as tobacco use, alcohol consumption, and working outside of the home. The relationship between cluster headache and hormonal events does not appear to be strong. Hormonal influences on the chronic form of cluster headache in women are a subject of investigation. The emerging understanding of the genetics of cluster headache increasingly suggests a genetic component, with familial transmission now recognized to be more common than previously appreciated. Head trauma, coronary artery disease, and migraine appear to be present in more patients with cluster headache than can be explained by chance alone. Ethnic and racial differences in prevalence are less well understood.

Cluster Headache↗