PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12484585

Is day case surgery the key to basic surgical training?

Abstract

The logbooks of 5 senior house officers (SHOs) were audited to determine progression of surgical skills on a single vascular firm. Total surgical experience and, in particular, experience in varicose vein and arterio-venous fistula surgery, performed in the day-case unit (DCU), were examined. Trainees were divided into those undertaking their first surgical SHO post (group 1, n = 2) and those who had had previous surgical exposure (group 2, n = 3) on the basic surgical training rotation. SHOs were exposed to a mean of 273 (+/- 41 SD) operative cases in 6 months. Emergency work comprised 15% (+/- 7%) of workload. Day cases accounted for 35% (+/- 3%) of elective workload. A mean of 66 (+/- 5) varicose vein and AVF cases were undertaken in the DCU. This represented 82% (+/- 6%) of day-case operative experience for the firm. SHOs undertook 12 (+/- 6) VV/AVF cases unassisted, 35 (+/- 5) cases with senior assistance, and 20 (+/- 11) as first assistance in the DCU. All SHOs progressed to being able to perform arterial bypass and amputation (with senior assistance) during their time on the firm. There was no significant difference in experience or progression to major vascular surgery between group 1 and group 2 in this study except in lower limb amputation procedures. It is concluded that vascular surgical firms can provide a good introduction to surgical skills. Most experience as first operator was gained in the DCU and we suggest that those undergoing basic surgical training might benefit from an attachment to the DCU early in their rotations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A R Weale, P A Lear, D C Mitchell. 2002. Is day case surgery the key to basic surgical training?. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588402760978256

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗