PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12485739

Reasoning with quantifiers.

Bart Geurts
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the semantics of natural language, quantification may have received more attention than any other subject, and one of the main topics in psychological studies on deductive reasoning is syllogistic inference, which is just a restricted form of reasoning with quantifiers. But thus far the semantical and psychological enterprises have remained disconnected. This paper aims to show how our understanding of syllogistic reasoning may benefit from semantical research on quantification. I present a very simple logic that pivots on the monotonicity properties of quantified statements--properties that are known to be crucial not only to quantification but to a much wider range of semantical phenomena. This logic is shown to account for the experimental evidence available in the literature as well as for the data from a new experiment with cardinal quantifiers ("at least n" and "at most n"), which cannot be explained by any other theory of syllogistic reasoning.

Explore related subjects

CognitionDecision MakingHumansPsychological TheorySemanticsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bart Geurts. 2003. Reasoning with quantifiers.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00180-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Workers' assessments of manual lifting tasks: cognitive strategies and validation with respect to objective indices and musculoskeletal symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the different cognitive strategies adopted by workers in assessing the effects of lifting-task parameters on effort, and to validate workers' assessments. METHODS: Questionnaires were administered to 217 male workers with varied levels of experience in manual handling. Workers were asked to assess the effects of lifting on perceived effort, using linguistic descriptors (e.g., light, heavy), and to determine the physical meaning of such descriptors. In addition, each worker assessed on-the-job effort, perceived risk of injury and work dissatisfaction, and musculoskeletal outcomes in a cross-sectional design. RESULTS: Perceived physical effort was significantly associated with lifting variables. Results indicated that the three-cluster strategy is the best performer. Weight of load emerged as the most influential factor that impacted on effort in the most dominant cluster (close to 50% of the observations). The second cluster (25% of the observations) demonstrated that weight, horizontal distance, and twisting angle, contributed equally to effort, and the third cluster had weight and vertical travel distance as the most important variables (with travel distance being more important). Perceived effort was significantly associated with objective indices (i.e., biomechanical lifting equivalent and NIOSH lifting index), and musculoskeletal symptoms in eight body parts. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive reasoning of experienced workers may be used as an active device for the evaluation of strenuous physical activities such as lifting tasks. Lifting activities are significantly associated with musculoskeletal symptoms, not only in the lower-back region, but also in seven other body parts; and effort may integrate the effects of both physical (lifting tasks) and non-physical (i.e., work dissatisfaction) factors, as well as perception of risk.

Cognition↗
PubMed2003

The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism.

It has been proposed that the capacity to code the 'like me' analogy between self and others constitutes a basic prerequisite and a starting point for social cognition. It is by means of this self/other equivalence that meaningful social bonds can be established, that we can recognize others as similar to us, and that imitation can take place. In this article I discuss recent neurophysiological and brain imaging data on monkeys and humans, showing that the 'like me' analogy may rest upon a series of 'mirror-matching' mechanisms. A new conceptual tool able to capture the richness of the experiences we share with others is introduced: the shared manifold of intersubjectivity. I propose that all kinds of interpersonal relations (imitation, empathy and the attribution of intentions) depend, at a basic level, on the constitution of a shared manifold space. This shared space is functionally characterized by automatic, unconscious embodied simulation routines.

Cognition↗