PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12489196

Expression, structure, and function of enamel proteinases.

Abstract

Proteinases serve two important functions during dental enamel formation: They (a) process and (b) degrade enamel proteins. Different enzymes carry out these functions. Enamelysin (MMP-20) is the foremost enamel matrix-processing enzyme. Its expression initiates prior to the onset of dentin mineralization and continues throughout the secretory stage of amelogenesis. In vitro, enamelysin catalyzes all of the amelogenin cleavages that are known to occur during the secretory stage in vivo, and it is probably the enzyme responsible for the processing of all enamel proteins. There is evidence suggesting that enamelysin activity is critical for proper enamel formation. Uncleaved and processed enamel proteins often segregate into different compartments within the developing enamel layer, suggesting that they may have different functions. Intact ameloblastin and its C-terminal cleavage products localize in the superficial rod and interrod enamel, while its N-terminal cleavage products congregate in the sheath space. Intact enamelin is only present at the mineralization front within a micrometer of the enamel surface, while its cleavage products concentrate in the rod and interrod enamel. Processed enamel proteins accumulate during the secretory stage, but disappear early in the maturation stage. Enamel matrix serine proteinase 1 (EMSP1), now officially designated kallikrein 4 (KLK4), is believed to be the predominant degradative enzyme that clears enamel proteins from the matrix during maturation. KLK4 expression initiates during the transition stage and continues throughout maturation. KLK4 concentrates at the enamel surface when the enamel matrix disappears, and aggressively degrades amelogenin in vitro. During tooth development, proteinases are secreted by ameloblasts into the extracellular space, where they cleave enamel proteins by catalyzing the hydrolysis of peptide bonds. Enamel proteinases are present in low abundance and are not likely to participate directly in the mineralization process. Two major enamel proteinases have been identified: enamelysin (MMP20) and kallikrein 4 (KLK4). These proteinases are expressed at different times and have different functions. Their roles are to modify and/or to eliminate enamel matrix proteins, which affects the way enamel proteins interact with each other and with the developing enamel crystallites. A brief review of dental enamel formation is presented, followed by a more detailed analysis of enamelysin and KLK4 expression, structure, and function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

James P Simmer, Jan C C Hu. 2002. Expression, structure, and function of enamel proteinases.. https://doi.org/10.1080/03008200290001159

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cellular uptake of amelogenin, and its localization to CD63, and Lamp1-positive vesicles.

Proteins of the developing enamel matrix include amelogenin, ameloblastin and enamelin. Of these three proteins amelogenin predominates. Protein-protein interactions are likely to occur at the ameloblast Tomes' processes between membrane-bound proteins and secreted enamel matrix proteins. Such protein-protein interactions could be associated with cell signaling or endocytosis. CD63 and Lamp1 are ubiquitously expressed, are lysosomal integral membrane proteins, and localize to the plasma membrane. CD63 and Lamp1 interact with amelogenin in vitro. In this study our objective was to study the molecular events of intercellular trafficking of an exogenous source of amelogenin, and related this movement to the spatiotemporal expression of CD63 and Lamp1 using various cell lineages. Exogenously added amelogenin moves rapidly into the cell into established Lamp1-positive vesicles that subsequently localize to the perinuclear region. These data indicate a possible mechanism by which amelogenin, or degraded amelogenin peptides, are removed from the extracellular matrix during enamel formation and maturation.

Amelogenesis↗

Variation in enamel development of South African fossil hominids.

Dental tissues provide important insights into aspects of hominid palaeobiology that are otherwise difficult to obtain from studies of the bony skeleton. Tooth enamel is formed by ameloblasts, which demonstrate daily secretory rhythms developing tissue-specific structures known as cross striations, and longer period markings called striae of Retzius. These enamel features were studied in the molars of two well known South African hominid species, Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus. Using newly developed portable confocal microscopy, we have obtained cross striation periodicities (number of cross striations between adjacent striae) for the largest sample of hominid teeth reported to date. These data indicate a mean periodicity of seven days in these small-bodied hominids. Important differences were observed in the inferred mechanisms of enamel development between these taxa. Ameloblasts maintain high rates of differentiation throughout cervical enamel development in P. robustus but not in A. africanus. In our sample, there were fewer lateral striae of Retzius in P. robustus than in A. africanus. In a molar of P. robustus, lateral enamel formed in a much shorter time than cuspal enamel, and the opposite was observed in two molars of A. africanus. In spite of the greater occlusal area and enamel thickness of the molars of both fossil species compared with modern humans, the total crown formation time of these three fossil molars was shorter than the corresponding tooth type in modern humans. Our results provide support for previous conclusions that molar crown formation time was short in Plio-Pleistocene hominids, and strongly suggest the presence of different mechanisms of amelogenesis, and thus tooth development, in these taxa.

Amelogenesis↗

Microstructure and chemical composition of primary teeth in children with Down syndrome and cerebral palsy.

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that prenatal growth insults leave permanent signs in the developing primary teeth that can be identified in later life. To test this hypothesis we examined exfoliated and extracted lower second primary molars of children with Down syndrome (DS) and cerebral palsy (CP). Teeth of children with no adverse medical history were used as a control group. Informed consent of parents and children was obtained in all cases. On each tooth two thin sections were cut, one bisecting the mesial cusps and one bisecting the distal cusps. Using a light microscope, the width of prenatal enamel and postnatal enamel was measured on each section at standardized locations from the dentin-enamel junction (DEJ) with the neonatal line used to distinguish between prenatal and postnatal enamel. Chemical analysis of each section was carried out using an energy dispersive spectrophotometer (ESR). The Ca/P ratios of enamel and dentin for each cusp were calculated and intercusp and intergroup differences analysed using non-parametric statistical tests. The results showed that significantly less enamel was laid down prenatally in DS and CP teeth than in the control group and that the enamel of the mesial cusps in these groups was less highly mineralised than that of the controls. The results also showed that in DS teeth growth and mineralisation of all cusps was affected. Based on these findings we propose that analysis of exfoliated deciduous teeth in developmentally challenged children may help in identifying the onset and severity of growth insults in utero and its impact on later development.

Amelogenesis↗