PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12493099

Evidence-based neurosurgery.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The evidence-based medicine movement is gaining influence in many medical specialties. Although many think that clinical medicine always has been based on evidence, the discipline of evidence-based medicine places particular emphasis on a defined set of principles of critical analysis of individual research reports, methodologically rigorous synthesis of multiple reports, and the collection and dissemination of evidence repositories that allow rapid application of evidence in practice. This article provides a selective introduction to the discipline of evidence-based medicine as it applies to neurological surgery. METHODS: The vast literature on evidence-based medicine has been reviewed selectively to identify resources that are readable, accessible, and relevant to neurosurgery. RESULTS: The history, concepts, and techniques of evidence-based medicine are presented in brief, and educational and methodological resources, as well as evidence repositories, are introduced. CONCLUSION: The techniques of evidence-based medicine are relevant to neurological surgery. There is a relatively large repository of critically analyzed and summarized evidence that is useful to the neurosurgical practitioner. Familiarity with these techniques and repositories can help the neurosurgeon bring the best available evidence to bear on the care of individual patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stephen J Haines. 2003. Evidence-based neurosurgery.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200301000-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical management. Design for living.

91 per cent of patients started treatment within two mounths of referral, compared to 70-80 per cent last year. The last five months has seen rapid progress at a rate of 2 per cent a month. Sustaining improvement depends on leadership, measurement and looking at the whole patient pathway.

Critical Pathways↗

[Clinical pathways -- first results of a systematic IT-supported application at a surgical department of a university hospital].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In analogy to industrial process management, clinical pathways have been introduced for operational process organisation in orthopedic and interventional procedures as well as for conservative treatments. Within this study, introduction and continuous, systematic application of clinical pathways at a surgical department of a university hospital was investigated. METHODS: Analysis was performed by IT-based (SAP/i. s. h.med) evaluation of the registered data regarding pathway violations. Additionally, patients' records were matched with the computerized data for quality assurance of pathway documentation. RESULTS: 501 patients were entered in 16 clinical pathways (31 +/- 39 patients per pathway). The mean period from the introduction of a distinct pathway to the data acquisition of the present study ranged from 2 to 14 months (mean 7+/-7.5 months). Pathway violations correlated with the complexity, but not with the period since the pathway was introduced. Organisational reasons next to medical reasons (i. e. delayed gastric function or wound healing) were the most frequent causes for pathway violations. CONCLUSION: Clinical pathways may not only be realised for operative procedures or conservative treatments, but represent a clinical and administrative management instrument at a surgical department of a university hospital for daily work routine. They are suitable as an instrument for clinical quality and risk management, as an economic control instrument in reorganisation phases as well as in the routine of surgical clinics.

Critical Pathways↗